Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 12, 2024. It is now read-only.

WIP: Create new generic bundle provisioner #773

Conversation

joelanford
Copy link
Member

Also, remove plain and registry bundle provisioners and move their logic into the respective bundle deployment provisioners.

We have a whole slew of e2e tests that exercise a bunch of "invalid" bundle unpacking failures that I (for now) marked as pending. That logic needs to be either moved to be tested at the bundle deployment level, where it the format-specific logic now lives, or perhaps it can be dropped or moved to unit/integration tests.

This is the idea that I mentioned in #772.

@joelanford joelanford requested a review from a team as a code owner December 16, 2023 06:49
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 16, 2023
Also, remove plain and registry bundle provisioners and move their logic
into the respective bundle deployment provisioners.

Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <[email protected]>
@joelanford joelanford force-pushed the poc-generic-bundle-provisioner branch from 13fadd2 to c37e283 Compare December 16, 2023 06:50
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 16, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (b4e9976) 20.62% compared to head (c37e283) 20.62%.
Report is 35 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #773   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   20.62%   20.62%           
=======================================
  Files          14       14           
  Lines        1086     1086           
=======================================
  Hits          224      224           
  Misses        812      812           
  Partials       50       50           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

This PR has become stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. Please update this PR or remove the lifecycle/stale label before it is automatically closed in 30 days. Adding the lifecycle/frozen label will cause this PR to ignore lifecycle events.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jan 16, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 20, 2024
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@joelanford joelanford closed this Jan 20, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants