Move builtInTemplates source code one level up #7611
Conversation
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request includes several changes across multiple files primarily related to import path modifications and a minor update to a diagram file. In Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
ui/main/src/app/modules/core/application-loading/application-loading.component.ts (1)
129-129: Consider adding specific error handling for template loading.While errors are caught by the outer try-catch, consider adding specific error handling for template loading failures to provide better error messages and potentially handle recovery.
- loadBuiltInTemplates(); + try { + await loadBuiltInTemplates(); + } catch (error) { + logger.error('Failed to load built-in templates', error); + throw error; // Re-throw to be caught by outer catch + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
src/docs/asciidoc/images/SoftwareArchitecture-UI.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
src/docs/asciidoc/images/SoftwareArchitecture-UI.drawio(2 hunks)ui/main/src/app/builtInTemplates/baseUserCardTemplate.ts(1 hunks)ui/main/src/app/builtInTemplates/task/card/taskCardTemplateView.ts(1 hunks)ui/main/src/app/builtInTemplates/templatesLoader.ts(1 hunks)ui/main/src/app/business/application-loader.ts(1 hunks)ui/main/src/app/modules/core/application-loading/application-loading.component.ts(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- src/docs/asciidoc/images/SoftwareArchitecture-UI.drawio
- ui/main/src/app/builtInTemplates/baseUserCardTemplate.ts
- ui/main/src/app/builtInTemplates/task/card/taskCardTemplateView.ts
- ui/main/src/app/builtInTemplates/templatesLoader.ts
🔇 Additional comments (3)
ui/main/src/app/modules/core/application-loading/application-loading.component.ts (1)
129-129: Verify template loading sequence.
The loadBuiltInTemplates function is called before startOpfab, but we should verify that all required dependencies are initialized before loading templates.
✅ Verification successful
Loading sequence is correctly implemented
The verification shows that:
loadBuiltInTemplatesis a simple synchronous function that only registers custom web components usingcustomElements.define- It's called at the right moment in the sequence:
- After application loader and components are set up
- Before
startOpfabis called - Within a try-catch block that properly handles any errors
- No special dependencies or async operations are required for template loading
The current implementation follows best practices for web component registration and maintains proper error handling through the existing try-catch block.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if loadBuiltInTemplates has any dependencies that need to be initialized first
# Search for any service dependencies in the templates loader
ast-grep --pattern 'import { $_ } from "$_"' templatesLoader.ts
# Search for service usage in the templates loader
rg -A 5 "constructor|@Inject" templatesLoader.ts
Length of output: 241
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find the correct path to the templates loader file
fd templatesLoader
# Once we find it, let's check its content and dependencies
rg -l "loadBuiltInTemplates" --type ts
# Let's also check what's being initialized before loadBuiltInTemplates in the component
rg -B 10 "loadBuiltInTemplates\(\)" ui/main/src/app/modules/core/application-loading/application-loading.component.ts
Length of output: 989
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of templatesLoader.ts to understand its dependencies
cat ui/main/src/app/builtInTemplates/templatesLoader.ts
# Let's also check what happens after loadBuiltInTemplates
rg -A 10 "loadBuiltInTemplates\(\)" ui/main/src/app/modules/core/application-loading/application-loading.component.ts
Length of output: 2406
ui/main/src/app/business/application-loader.ts (2)
48-48: LGTM: Import path update aligns with PR objective
The change from relative to absolute import path correctly reflects the restructuring of builtInTemplates source code.
48-48: Verify template loading sequence
The loadBuiltInTemplates call has been moved to ApplicationLoadingComponent. Please ensure that templates are loaded before any dependent operations in the initialization sequence.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the initialization sequence to verify the dependencies.
Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response:
Template loading sequence is correctly positioned
The loadBuiltInTemplates is now called in the ApplicationLoadingComponent before startOpfab(). Looking at the initialization sequence in ApplicationLoader, there are no template-dependent operations before or during the startup sequence. The only template-related initialization is TemplateCssService.setTemplatecssServer() which only sets up the server configuration and doesn't depend on the templates being loaded. The actual template usage happens after the application is fully loaded, making the current sequence appropriate.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the initialization sequence and dependencies of built-in templates
# Search for template usage in the application loading sequence
rg -A 5 "loadBuiltInTemplates|builtInTemplates" "ui/main/src/app/modules/core/application-loading"
# Search for any direct template usage that might need the templates to be loaded first
ast-grep --pattern 'template' 'ui/main/src/app/modules/core/application-loading'
Length of output: 1669
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of startOpfab and any template-dependent operations
ast-grep --pattern 'startOpfab() {
$$$
}'
# Search for any template usage in the application loader
rg -A 5 "template" "ui/main/src/app/business/application-loader.ts"
# Check if there are any direct dependencies on templates in the initialization sequence
rg -A 10 "startOpfab|init" "ui/main/src/app/business/application-loader.ts"
Length of output: 4531
freddidierRTE
force-pushed
the
FE-moveBuildInTemplates
branch
2 times, most recently
from
4b9a4fa
to
ad0d444
Compare
Signed-off-by: freddidierRTE <[email protected]>
freddidierRTE
force-pushed
the
FE-moveBuildInTemplates
branch
from
ad0d444
to
bfab062
Compare
|
Nothing in release note