Skip to content

[FSSDK-11452] Agent - netspring integration - experimentID, VariationID #438

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 13, 2025
Merged

[FSSDK-11452] Agent - netspring integration - experimentID, VariationID #438

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 13, 2025

Conversation

Mat001
Copy link
Contributor

@Mat001 Mat001 commented Jun 13, 2025

Summary

  • Make agent work with added experimentID and variationID to decision notification listener
  • that logic has already been implemented in go-sdk nd it propagates to agent
  • no logic changes needed to agent, experimentID and variationID are passing to agent, I just added unit test to very the two

Issues

https://jira.sso.episerver.net/browse/FSSDK-11452

@Mat001 Mat001 self-assigned this Jun 13, 2025
@jaeopt jaeopt changed the title [FSSDK-11452] Afent - netspring integration - experimentID, VariationID [FSSDK-11452] Agent - netspring integration - experimentID, VariationID Jun 13, 2025
jaeopt
jaeopt approved these changes Jun 13, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@jaeopt jaeopt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Mat001 Mat001 merged commit 752dfc8 into master Jun 13, 2025
13 checks passed
@Mat001 Mat001 deleted the mpirnovar-experid-variationid-fssdk-11452 branch June 13, 2025 19:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@jaeopt jaeopt jaeopt approved these changes

Assignees

@Mat001 Mat001

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@Mat001 @jaeopt