Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated health endpoints for Timescale #377 #718

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Ravisaketi
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed changes

Updated health endpoints for Timescale #377

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to the project?
Put an x in the boxes that apply

  • Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Maintenance (update of libraries or other dependences)

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply. You can also fill these out after creating the PR. If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask. We're here to help! This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • I have signed the CLA
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have run all the existing tests locally (not just those related to my feature) and there are no errors
  • After the last push to the PR branch, I have run the lint script locally and there are no changes to the code base
  • I have updated the RELEASE NOTES
  • I have added necessary documentation (if appropriate)
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 4, 2023

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️

@c0c0n3
Copy link
Member

c0c0n3 commented Jan 6, 2023

@Necravisaketi this PR isn't really what we want I think. It's my fault as I was very late, like very, answering your question about configured DB backends. See my comments to #705. We should

  • implement some function to build the set of configured DBs
  • for each DB in the set, perform the health check

I suppose the easiest is to ditch this PR and start over? Again, sorry about that, entirely my fault.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants