Proposed implications (3-4 tokens only)

[vcvpaiva]

typing ==> writing (PWN gloss says: write by means of a keyboard with types)
sawing ==> cutting (PWN gloss says: cut with a saw)
running ==> moving (PWN gloss says: move fast by using one's feet, with one foot off the ground at any given time)
hiking ==> walking ==> moving (walk a long way, as for pleasure or physical exercise)
swimming ==> moving (move as if gliding through water)
dancing ==> moving (3 senses)
grazing ==> eating (PWN gloss says: feed as in a meadow or pasture)
battling ==> fighting
lazying ==> idling ==> resting

someone ==> person (PWN gloss says: a human being)
man ==> person (PWN gloss says: an adult person who is male)
woman ==> person (PWN gloss says: an adult female person)
baby ==> person
biker ==> person (not in PWN)
clown ==> person (PWN: a person who amuses others by ridiculous behavior)
fish ==> animal

[vcvpaiva]

in 390 sentences (275 lemmas) we have only 1 conjunction,
19 negs marked, 37 negations not marked (27expletive+no, 10 nobody)= 56 negations in total.
140 direct object ones and 5 passive ones, hence, 233 -140= 88 intransitives, of which 13 copulas.
this is all half wrong, of course. 385 nsubjs.