Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Prdp 163 feat quarkus java engine #83

Draft
wants to merge 32 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Prdp 163 feat quarkus java engine #83

wants to merge 32 commits into from

Conversation

alessio-cialini
Copy link
Collaborator

@alessio-cialini alessio-cialini commented Oct 19, 2023 •
edited
Loading

List of Changes

  • Introducing Quarkus based version of the Java PDF Engine component, managing requests through a reactive structure
  • Updated helm charts, and referring to the custom maven code review action
  • Updated unit tests

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

alexyey and others added 15 commits October 10, 2023 17:29
@alexyey
quarkus_app_test: introducing quarkus based app for pdf-engine-java
5e02bd7
@alessio-cialini
temp commit
f402a2a
@alessio-cialini
quarkus_app_test: introducing reactive management
f0da050
@alessio-cialini
quarkus_app_test: introducing reactive management
50913d0
@alexyey @alessio-cialini
quarkus_app_test: introducing quarkus based app for pdf-engine-java
c70e2fb
@alessio-cialini
temp commit
d892526
@alessio-cialini
quarkus_app_test: introducing reactive management
cfc6ea0
@alessio-cialini
quarkus_app_test: introducing reactive management
023d90c
@alessio-cialini
quarkus_app_test: introducing reactive management
da31bcd
@alessio-cialini
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/quarkus_app_test' into quarkus_a…
a949aa8 
…pp_test

# Conflicts:
#	pom.xml
#	src/main/java/it/gov/pagopa/pdf/engine/service/impl/GeneratePDFServiceImpl.java
@alessio-cialini
[PRDP-163] feat: Introducing changes to define Quarkus Java Engine an…
e910449 
…d related changes to pipelines for deploy and int.test
@alessio-cialini
[PRDP-163] feat: Updated error management on reactive streams
165d239
@alessio-cialini
[PRDP-163] feat: Updated info endpoint and client service
55d22f2
@alessio-cialini
[PRDP-163] feat: Updated info service tests
4aa5c9c
@alessio-cialini
[PRDP-163] feat: Updated tests, introducing configurations for applic…
9ab2d3a 
…ation insight agent
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request does not contain a valid label. Please add one of the following labels: [patch, minor, major, skip]

@pagopa pagopa deleted a comment from sonarqubecloud bot Oct 25, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

This PR exceeds the recommended size of 400 lines. Please make sure you are NOT addressing multiple issues with one PR. Note this PR might be rejected due to its size.

@github-actions
Copy link

Comment this PR with update_code to update openapi.json and format the code. Consider to use pre-commit to format the code.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 17 Code Smells

84.5% 84.5% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@pasqualespica pasqualespica marked this pull request as draft January 24, 2024 14:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@pasqualespica pasqualespica Awaiting requested review from pasqualespica

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

@alessio-cialini alessio-cialini

Labels
major onhold size/large
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@alessio-cialini @pasqualespica @alexyey