Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Allow open and closed loop behavior for limits enforcing classes #3

Closed
adolfo-rt opened this issue Nov 12, 2013 · 1 comment
Closed

Allow open and closed loop behavior for limits enforcing classes #3

adolfo-rt opened this issue Nov 12, 2013 · 1 comment
Assignees
@adolfo-rt

Comments

@adolfo-rt
Copy link

We recently made the joint limiting interfaces for position and velocity joints open loop. The previous closed-loop behavior has been removed, which is not really good. I propose to allow both methods in the implementation (defaulting to closed loop behavior, the safest choice). Code, doc and tests should be updated.
@ghost ghost assigned adolfo-rt Nov 12, 2013
@adolfo-rt adolfo-rt mentioned this issue Nov 12, 2013
Merged
@adolfo-rt
Copy link
Author

Duplicate of #2.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@adolfo-rt adolfo-rt

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@adolfo-rt