[draft] Introduce TransactionExtensionPipeline to use instead of tuple for pipeline with more than 12 elements
#6571
Conversation
|
All GitHub workflows were cancelled due to failure one of the required jobs. |
| #[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Encode, Decode, TypeInfo)] | ||
| pub struct TransactionExtensionPipeline< | ||
| $( $generic = (), )* | ||
| >( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
another solution is to implement a wrapper of tuple, that manually implements Debug, PartialEq, Eq, and also implements TransactionExtension.
This way the type may look less like a hack.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This would work, we just need to make sure we expose it properly in the metadata so that it's not transparent, right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am not sure I understand, the metadata is anyway just a vec of TransactionExtensionMetadata.
What I am thinking is we can implement do either:
- like this PR currently, a type with 32 generics being
()by default. - or a type with only 1 generic, and do
impl<A> Debug for Pipeline<(A,)> ..,impl<A, B> Debug for Pipeline<(A, B)> ..etc...
Both implementation would be transparent
Fix #6569