Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[stable2412] Backport #7243 #7527

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: stable2412
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

paritytech-cmd-bot-polkadot-sdk[bot]

Backport #7243 into stable2412 from dhirajs0.

See the documentation on how to use this bot.

# Description

Fixes #7039

The Preservation of transfer method of fungible and fungibles adapters
is changed from Preserve to Expendable. So the behavior of the
TransferAsset will be consistent with the WithdrawAsset function, as in
[fungible](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/blob/f3ab3854e1df9e0498599f01ba4f9f152426432a/polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/fungible_adapter.rs#L217)
and [fungibles](https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot-sdk/issues/url)
adapter.

This pull request includes changes to the `fungible_adapter.rs` and
`fungibles_adapter.rs` files in the `polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder`
directory. The main change involves modifying the transfer method to use
the `Expendable` strategy instead of the `Preserve` strategy.

Changes to transfer strategy:

*
[`polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/fungible_adapter.rs`](diffhunk://#diff-6ebd77385441f2c8b023c480e818a01c4b43ae892c73ca30144cd64ee960bd66L67-R67):
Changed the transfer method to use `Expendable` instead of `Preserve`.
*
[`polkadot/xcm/xcm-builder/src/fungibles_adapter.rs`](diffhunk://#diff-82221429de4c4c88be3d2976ece6475ef4fa56a32abc70290911bd47191f8e17L61-R61):
Changed the transfer method to use `Expendable` instead of `Preserve`.

---------

Co-authored-by: Francisco Aguirre <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit f96da6f)
@paritytech-cmd-bot-polkadot-sdk paritytech-cmd-bot-polkadot-sdk bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 10, 2025 16:50
@github-actions github-actions bot added the A3-backport Pull request is already reviewed well in another branch. label Feb 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is amending an existing release. Please proceed with extreme caution,
as to not impact downstream teams that rely on the stability of it. Some things to consider:

  • Backports are only for 'patch' or 'minor' changes. No 'major' or other breaking change.
  • Should be a legit fix for some bug, not adding tons of new features.
  • Must either be already audited or not need an audit.
Emergency Bypass

If you really need to bypass this check: add validate: false to each crate
in the Prdoc where a breaking change is introduced. This will release a new major
version of that crate and all its reverse dependencies and basically break the release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A3-backport Pull request is already reviewed well in another branch.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants