Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Snowbridge - Removes obsolete test in Outbound Queue v2 #8019

Closed

Conversation

claravanstaden
Copy link
Contributor

The test is only relevant for Snowbridge v1.

Resolves: SNO-1432

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature.
@paritytech-review-bot paritytech-review-bot bot requested a review from a team March 25, 2025 09:56
@acatangiu acatangiu added the R0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes label Mar 25, 2025
@@ -140,67 +140,6 @@ fn process_message_fails_on_overweight_message() {
})
}

#[test]
fn governance_message_not_processed_in_same_block_when_queue_congested_with_low_priority_messages()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is this test obsolete?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vgeddes @yrong is this test truly obsolete? Is the functionality of governance messages not the same as Snowbridge v1?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@acatangiu it is not really relevant anymore, since this test was to ensure that governance messages would be processed first in multi-channel Snowbridge V1. Since any messages can be processed in any order in V2, it is not really relevant. But, to reduce code churn and because the test is passing, I am closing this for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
R0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants