Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Run cypress tests in parallel #437

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Run cypress tests in parallel #437

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

ArmaanT
Copy link
Member

@ArmaanT ArmaanT commented Apr 23, 2021

This needs a few fixes but maybe it can work @cphalen

@rohangpta
Copy link
Member

@joyliu-q @alxkp @cphalen I know we were talking about faster CI at some point. Is anyone able to take a look at this?

@joyliu-q
Copy link
Contributor

joyliu-q commented Jan 4, 2023

Just looked at docs and this seems reasonable to me. Any reason push integration tests are failing though? (Rerunning CIs again)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Base: 71.14% // Head: 71.14% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (eb5de31) compared to base (ed5cdf5).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #437   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   71.14%   71.14%           
=======================================
  Files          30       30           
  Lines        6065     6065           
=======================================
  Hits         4315     4315           
  Misses       1750     1750           
Flag Coverage Δ
backend 71.14% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@rohangpta
Copy link
Member

image

This seems to be reason for failure.

@joyliu-q
Copy link
Contributor

joyliu-q commented Jan 4, 2023

@rohangpta I also don't think we're passing in the record key via --key, which is also required. Can we generate and add the record key as a ENV variable?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants