Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pd: rename "testnet" subcommand to "network" #4684

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 1, 2024
Merged

Conversation

conorsch
Copy link
Contributor

Describe your changes

Mostly a cosmetic change, since it's a rename. Requires lots of carry-over throughout the docs. Kept the internal APIs the same for the most part. This is a breaking change from the context of node operators, though, because now pd will look in a different location for info.

Issue ticket number and link

N/A

Checklist before requesting a review

  • If this code contains consensus-breaking changes, I have added the "consensus-breaking" label. Otherwise, I declare my belief that there are not consensus-breaking changes, for the following reason:

    This is a breaking change for the CLI, for sure, although I tried hard not to touch critical app logic. Careful attention should be paid to e.g. pd network generate and make sure the functionality remains the same.

Mostly a cosmetic change, since it's a rename. Requires lots of
carry-over throughout the docs. Kept the internal APIs the same for the
most part. This is a breaking change from the context of node operators,
though, because now pd will look in a different location for info.
Copy link
Member

@erwanor erwanor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, no protocol changes

@conorsch conorsch merged commit b49a4f2 into main Jul 1, 2024
13 checks passed
@conorsch conorsch deleted the pd-testnet-rename branch July 1, 2024 20:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants