Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated dependencies #807

Merged
merged 25 commits into from
Mar 15, 2024
Merged

Updated dependencies #807

merged 25 commits into from
Mar 15, 2024

Conversation

hendrikvdkaaden
Copy link
Contributor

Updated the dependencies version to the latest version.

stephanmantel
stephanmantel previously approved these changes Feb 27, 2024
@stephanmantel
Copy link
Contributor

Could you commit an empty commit to re-trigger the checks?

Should make #807 work, the pipeline reports failures related to using a Dart version that's incompatible
@0biWanKenobi 0biWanKenobi mentioned this pull request Mar 7, 2024
stephanmantel and others added 7 commits March 8, 2024 10:53
…o test_utils and expect the test to throw this exception
# Conflicts:
#	.github/workflows/ci.yml
#	floor/pubspec.lock
#	floor/pubspec.yaml
#	floor_generator/pubspec.lock
#	floor_generator/pubspec.yaml
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.92%. Comparing base (9967c32) to head (3069255).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #807   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    91.92%   91.92%           
========================================
  Files           11       11           
  Lines          223      223           
========================================
  Hits           205      205           
  Misses          18       18           
Flag Coverage Δ
floor 91.92% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@SEGVeenstra SEGVeenstra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not very experienced with the code base, but for what I can tell it looks good to me with just one question in the comments.
If you don't have any urgency you might want to get a second opinion from @stephanmantel next week.

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
import 'dart:io';

import 'package:path/path.dart';
// ignore: unnecessary_import
import 'package:sqflite/sqflite.dart';
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If it's unnecessary, can it not just be removed?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The import is necessary. I added the ignore because when we run the build_runner, it indicates that it's an unnecessary import, causing the pipeline to fail.

@hendrikvdkaaden hendrikvdkaaden merged commit a618e06 into develop Mar 15, 2024
8 checks passed
@hendrikvdkaaden hendrikvdkaaden deleted the feature/dep_update branch March 15, 2024 08:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants