Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add rfc for ECS not under ELB (Issue#4616) #4676

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 18, 2023

Conversation

t-kikuc
Copy link
Member

@t-kikuc t-kikuc commented Nov 17, 2023

What this PR does / why we need it:

To support progressive delivery for ECS without ELB.

It's not so big change, but I think ECS users will be affected in the future.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Part of #4616

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

  • How are users affected by this change: No
  • Is this breaking change: No
  • How to migrate (if breaking change): No

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 17, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (469cb88) 30.82% compared to head (00be2fb) 30.84%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4676      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   30.82%   30.84%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         221      221              
  Lines       25935    25935              
==========================================
+ Hits         7995     7999       +4     
+ Misses      17290    17286       -4     
  Partials      650      650              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@t-kikuc
Copy link
Member Author

t-kikuc commented Nov 17, 2023

I'll modify DCO and Target Version: (s1.x / 2.x) soon today.

@khanhtc1202
Copy link
Member

@t-kikuc please sign the commit with git commit -s

@t-kikuc t-kikuc force-pushed the add-rfc-ecs-not-under-elb branch from ea997b7 to 8711db2 Compare November 17, 2023 06:30
Signed-off-by: t-kikuc <[email protected]>
@t-kikuc t-kikuc force-pushed the add-rfc-ecs-not-under-elb branch from 0795a3d to 14d7e4e Compare November 17, 2023 06:44
@t-kikuc
Copy link
Member Author

t-kikuc commented Nov 17, 2023

@khanhtc1202 thank you.
I signed and passed DCO check.

@t-kikuc
Copy link
Member Author

t-kikuc commented Nov 17, 2023

This is the canary deployment flow in RFC (GitHub fails to render):

canary

@t-kikuc
Copy link
Member Author

t-kikuc commented Nov 17, 2023

This is the blue/green deployment flow in RFC (GitHub fails to render):

bluegreen

Copy link
Member

@khanhtc1202 khanhtc1202 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Look great, let's gooo 🚀

@khanhtc1202 khanhtc1202 merged commit 5851350 into pipe-cd:master Nov 18, 2023
13 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Dec 1, 2023
sZma5a pushed a commit to sZma5a/pipecd that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2023
sZma5a pushed a commit to sZma5a/pipecd that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2023
sZma5a pushed a commit to sZma5a/pipecd that referenced this pull request Dec 17, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Feb 6, 2024
sZma5a pushed a commit to sZma5a/pipecd that referenced this pull request Feb 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants