Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

PMK-6018 rhel 8.9 support #368

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2024
Merged

PMK-6018 rhel 8.9 support #368

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2024

Conversation

devidask27
Copy link
Contributor

@devidask27 devidask27 commented Apr 2, 2024 •
edited
Loading

ISSUE(S):

https://platform9.atlassian.net/browse/PMK-6018

SUMMARY

Added support for RHEL 8.9

ISSUE TYPE

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that may cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

TESTING DONE

Manual

Able to onboard node

Reviewers

/cc @psarwate @poojaghumre @srinivaschavan

psarwate
psarwate approved these changes Apr 2, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@psarwate psarwate left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@devidask27 devidask27 merged commit 049052a into master Apr 2, 2024
4 checks passed
@devidask27 devidask27 deleted the private/master/devidas/PMK-6018 branch April 2, 2024 11:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@psarwate psarwate psarwate approved these changes

@srinivaschavan srinivaschavan srinivaschavan approved these changes

@pmaru-p9 pmaru-p9 pmaru-p9 approved these changes

@poojaghumre poojaghumre Awaiting requested review from poojaghumre

@srm6867 srm6867 Awaiting requested review from srm6867

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@devidask27 @psarwate @srinivaschavan @pmaru-p9