You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A recent change was made to support IR-RGB publishing/pointcloud colorization (#12). This change inadvertently broke other usage (#12 (comment)).
The change was introduced to address synchronization issues between the realsense RGB camera and the pointcloud. In the prior version, the pointcloud and RGB were generated by different cameras. Synchronization was performed by timestamp syncing, which sometimes meant frames were mismatched by as much as 1/2 the frame rate. This is problematic when dealing with moving captures.
Because the IR-RGB image is directly used in generating the pointcloud, the two are exactly synchronized. An additional side benefit is that the image and pointcloud are represented in the same frame, making pixel to pixel mapping very efficient. The only downside, is that the IR-RGB image has some small IR artifacts that cause the image to look slightly different from the RGB image. Mainly, the IR-RGB image is less sensitive to red color.
I recommend that all applications switch to the IR-RGB image from the RGB image for the improvements stated above. However, to support older usage, we should consider modifying the driver to support both. Allowing both RGB and IR-RGB image streams and some kind of switch to control which is used for colorized pointcloud mapping.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A recent change was made to support IR-RGB publishing/pointcloud colorization (#12). This change inadvertently broke other usage (#12 (comment)).
The change was introduced to address synchronization issues between the realsense RGB camera and the pointcloud. In the prior version, the pointcloud and RGB were generated by different cameras. Synchronization was performed by timestamp syncing, which sometimes meant frames were mismatched by as much as 1/2 the frame rate. This is problematic when dealing with moving captures.
Because the IR-RGB image is directly used in generating the pointcloud, the two are exactly synchronized. An additional side benefit is that the image and pointcloud are represented in the same frame, making pixel to pixel mapping very efficient. The only downside, is that the IR-RGB image has some small IR artifacts that cause the image to look slightly different from the RGB image. Mainly, the IR-RGB image is less sensitive to red color.
I recommend that all applications switch to the IR-RGB image from the RGB image for the improvements stated above. However, to support older usage, we should consider modifying the driver to support both. Allowing both RGB and IR-RGB image streams and some kind of switch to control which is used for colorized pointcloud mapping.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: