Port code to use ext-encoding #244
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
this is a test run to see what it's like to work with the new API. So far, it seems to be OK, although I keep forgetting the parameters for the static methods, which is annoying. Instinctively I'm reaching for instance methods, and I have to keep reminding myself why I chose to implement the new API this way instead of using instance methods (it's because this design is more resistant to mistakes).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
this is a test run to see what it's like to work with the new API.
So far, it seems to be OK, although I keep forgetting the parameters for the static methods, which is annoying. Instinctively I'm reaching for instance methods, and I have to keep reminding myself why I chose to implement the new API this way instead of using instance methods (it's because this design is more resistant to mistakes).
Haven't tested this yet. Fine to ignore the test errors (it's just because the extension isn't present).