-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(python): Add "execute_options" support for read_database_uri
#14682
feat(python): Add "execute_options" support for read_database_uri
#14682
Conversation
033722f
to
d4304b6
Compare
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #14682 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 81.01% 81.01%
=======================================
Files 1331 1331
Lines 172773 172776 +3
Branches 2455 2456 +1
=======================================
+ Hits 139966 139972 +6
+ Misses 32339 32337 -2
+ Partials 468 467 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In favor of adding execute_options
👍
Why does connectorx not support this?
They have an open issue about it here... sfu-db/connector-x#208 ...which includes a mention about why it's a bit tricky to implement. |
d4304b6
to
9729e04
Compare
b07e744
to
92a5151
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All right, good to go!
read_database_uri
read_database_uri
Closes #14631.
The
adbc
engine only has limited support for "execute_options" (andconnectorx
has no support at all), but we can still make the API more consistent for those cases where such options are valid (such as use of "parameters" with theadbc
engine and a SQLite backend).