Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Force nested struct missing equality #19031

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

barak1412
Copy link
Contributor

Follow-up for @coastalwhite CR comment on #18930.

@ritchie46 ritchie46 changed the title Fix: Force nested struct missing equality fix: Force nested struct missing equality Sep 30, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added fix Bug fix python Related to Python Polars rust Related to Rust Polars and removed title needs formatting labels Sep 30, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.87%. Comparing base (c23266b) to head (d7316f7).
Report is 13 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #19031      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   79.84%   79.87%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1524     1524              
  Lines      207653   207747      +94     
  Branches     2905     2908       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits       165802   165938     +136     
+ Misses      41303    41260      -43     
- Partials      548      549       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ritchie46 ritchie46 merged commit 477a80e into pola-rs:main Sep 30, 2024
26 of 27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
fix Bug fix python Related to Python Polars rust Related to Rust Polars
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants