Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CGMES. Import StaticVarCompensators: sVCControlMode and voltageSetPoint are deprecated and optional in CGMES 3.0 #3272

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

marqueslanauja
Copy link
Contributor

@marqueslanauja marqueslanauja commented Jan 13, 2025

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

Does this PR already have an issue describing the problem?

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Bug fix

What is the current behavior?

The attributes svcControlMode and voltageSetpoint are optional in CGMES 3.0. The current version treats these attributes as mandatory, so staticVarCompensators without them are not imported.

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

Now, these attributes are treated as optional. StaticVarCompensators without them are imported.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change or deprecate an API?

  • Yes
  • No

If yes, please check if the following requirements are fulfilled

  • The Breaking Change or Deprecated label has been added
  • The migration steps are described in the following section

What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR? (migration steps)

Other information:

@zamarrenolm zamarrenolm changed the title cgmes 3.0 import staticVarCompensators. SVCControlMode and voltageSetPoint are optional in Cgmes 3.0 CGMES. Import StaticVarCompensators: sVCControlMode and voltageSetPoint are deprecated and optional in CGMES 3.0 Jan 14, 2025
@zamarrenolm zamarrenolm marked this pull request as ready for review January 14, 2025 08:54
@zamarrenolm zamarrenolm self-requested a review January 14, 2025 08:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants