Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dynamic Port Breakout HLD - initial commit #71

Open
wants to merge 234 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

amin-alavi
Copy link

No description provided.

seiferteric and others added 30 commits July 29, 2019 20:29
Includes changes from Sachin, Arun and Partha.
Added text and images for the Transformer section of the HLD.
The first reversion was pushed by accident.
This reverts commit 308a985.
Updated GNMI information
Updated the overall architecture diagram to reflect the addition of the Transformer component.
* Put document in DRAFT state
* Made changes throughout to account for Transformer module
* MIscellaneous fixes for typos
…an image that did not add much in the gnmi section
* Concurrent Access via Redis CAS transactions
* Added support for Subscribe API in translib
update the transformer section with the latest progress
bhavini-gada and others added 28 commits January 14, 2020 22:12
PortChannel, Vlan etc are merged into one single HLD.
PortChannel, Vlan etc are merged into one single Interfaces HLD.
add initial version of data VRF HLD in mgmt framework
…ld_cvl

Mgmt framework HLD update for CVL enhancements
…rlo#66)

* Update Mgmt framework HLD for CLI/Transformer enhancements
respect to OpenAPI 3.0 upgrade
* Update gNMI sections
* Address comments
Updated mgmt-framework to include details with
@darshan-tawde
Copy link

darshan-tawde commented May 20, 2020

1.1.1

Current design is a combination of Dynamic Port Breakout on top of existing HW profiles.

How is following case handled ?

When we have a customer using non-default port-profiles at lower speed.

For example , BRCM-IT is using all S5232 in 10G profile mode , ( 96x10G + 8 x100G) , all 100G ports are consumed for uplinks.
In future if they want to use few 25 G ports or 100G ports, can the 10G ports be re-configured to run at 25G or 100G ?

1.2.2

Which container this code is manage by ?

TBD

3.6.2.1
Example shows breakout mode 2x50G , are we targetting 50G support in 3.1 on Dell Platforms ?

3.6.4

Service and Docker management

TBD - if new service/containerintroduced

Error Handling

TBD

What are the log messages for various error conditions ?

NPU limitations,
Unsupported speed

  1. Warm Boot Support

TBD

  1. Scalability

NPU limitations , how are they handled ?

  1. Unit Test coverage

TBD

What is the current Unit Test coverage ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.