Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generate AppWrapper name in tests to provide unique workloads #591

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2024

Conversation

sutaakar
Copy link
Contributor

@sutaakar sutaakar commented Jul 11, 2024

Issue link

N/A

What changes have been made

Generating AppWrapper name to make sure that AppWrappers are unique to avoid reconciliation issues.

Verification steps

PR checks pass reliably.

Checks

  • I've made sure the tests are passing.
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Manual tests
    • Testing is not required for this change

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 11, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from sutaakar. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@sutaakar sutaakar force-pushed the context branch 12 times, most recently from 00a2cae to 4de87c0 Compare July 12, 2024 09:32
@sutaakar sutaakar changed the title Provide more context Generate AppWrapper name to provide unique workloads Jul 12, 2024
@sutaakar sutaakar marked this pull request as ready for review July 12, 2024 10:52
@sutaakar sutaakar requested review from dgrove-oss and removed request for dimakis and ChristianZaccaria July 12, 2024 10:53
@sutaakar sutaakar changed the title Generate AppWrapper name to provide unique workloads Generate AppWrapper name in tests to provide unique workloads Jul 12, 2024
@dgrove-oss
Copy link
Collaborator

dgrove-oss commented Jul 12, 2024

We haven't considered wrapping resources that use GenerateName. Looking to see if it is easily fixable...

@dgrove-oss
Copy link
Collaborator

I updated #588 to pick up AppWrapper 0.21.1 which has the fix for generateNames. Not sure how best to merge the 2 PRs

@sutaakar
Copy link
Contributor Author

Will merge your PR first, then update this PR to use generated names for resources

@sutaakar sutaakar merged commit 26a1276 into project-codeflare:main Jul 17, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed
@sutaakar sutaakar deleted the context branch July 17, 2024 07:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants