Skip to content

Remove extra mut from the server replication query #489

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 21, 2025

Conversation

Shatur
Copy link
Contributor

@Shatur Shatur commented May 18, 2025

We don't actually mutate ConnectedClient.

@Shatur Shatur requested a review from UkoeHB May 18, 2025 13:31
We don't actually mutate `ConnectedClient`.
@Shatur Shatur force-pushed the connected-extra-mut branch from 6401eb2 to 53ce529 Compare May 18, 2025 13:32
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.16%. Comparing base (e1586e2) to head (53ce529).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #489   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.16%   81.16%           
=======================================
  Files          52       52           
  Lines        2989     2989           
=======================================
  Hits         2426     2426           
  Misses        563      563           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Shatur Shatur enabled auto-merge (rebase) May 18, 2025 13:41
@Shatur Shatur merged commit 0182f5e into master May 21, 2025
8 checks passed
@Shatur Shatur deleted the connected-extra-mut branch May 21, 2025 22:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants