update license with year and contributors

[wang-boyu]

Partly addresses #46.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #86 (4248933) into master (0bdbad6) will decrease coverage by 7.10%.
The diff coverage is 71.85%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #86      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.67%   78.57%   -7.11%     
==========================================
  Files           5        7       +2     
  Lines         363      574     +211     
  Branches       57       97      +40     
==========================================
+ Hits          311      451     +140     
- Misses         37      107      +70     
- Partials       15       16       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
mesa_geo/geospace.py	84.84% <67.56%> (-3.42%)	⬇️
mesa_geo/geoagent.py	78.94% <70.00%> (+0.78%)	⬆️
mesa_geo/raster_layers.py	70.27% <70.27%> (ø)
mesa_geo/geo_base.py	76.92% <76.92%> (ø)
mesa_geo/visualization/modules/MapVisualization.py	89.28% <84.61%> (+5.50%)	⬆️
mesa_geo/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c7fe7cb...4248933. Read the comment docs.

[rht]

What happened to the codecov diff?

[rht]

I think they updated the way they calculate the coverage?

[wang-boyu]

This is weird. By looking into https://github.com/projectmesa/mesa-geo/pull/86/files#annotation_4050756535 there are lots of warnings under "Unchanged files with check annotations".

Might be related:

• GHA/Codecov: "Unchanged files with check annotations (Beta)" is noisy crate/crate#10824
• "Unchanged files with check annotations" is disruptive and should be configurable actions/toolkit#457

[rht]

I will just merge this PR.

[wang-boyu]

Looks like the base commit that Codecov is comparing against is wrong. I'll work on my next PR as usual and see if we can get the correct base commit then.