Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Addressing code reviews #18

Merged
merged 28 commits into from
Jul 23, 2024
Merged

Addressing code reviews #18

merged 28 commits into from
Jul 23, 2024

Conversation

veronicaz41
Copy link
Collaborator

@veronicaz41 veronicaz41 commented Jul 17, 2024

Addressing code reviews: #15.

There is still one issue not addressed. Tracked here:
#17

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 17, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
zukyc-gpc-prover-client ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 23, 2024 6:03pm
zukyc-gpc-verifier ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 23, 2024 6:03pm
zukyc-issuer-client ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 23, 2024 6:03pm
zukyc-issuer-server ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 23, 2024 6:03pm

@veronicaz41
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@artwyman merging this now. Feel free to make comments any time, I'll address in future PRs. Thanks!

@veronicaz41 veronicaz41 merged commit 6f4e544 into main Jul 23, 2024
5 checks passed
Copy link
Member

@artwyman artwyman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! A few more suggestions in comments.
I also captured several Linear tasks for POD/GPC library improvements to follow up on what we learned here.

README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
max: BigInt(getDates().eighteenYearsAgo.getTime())
}
},
// Prove the presence of an entry called "socialSecurityNumber", hide its value
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The separation of ID number and SSN is realistic, though seems somewhat redundant for the level of detail of this example. Could probably just use idNumber for both sanctions list and correlation to paystub? I don't have a strong opinion on it, though.

apps/gpc-verifier/app/util/proofRequest.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
apps/gpc-verifier/app/util/proofRequest.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
@veronicaz41
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Addressed the comments in this PR: #22

@veronicaz41 veronicaz41 deleted the vzheng/readme branch October 30, 2024 23:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants