Use unique artifact names

[agriyakhetarpal]

Description

Addresses one out of two parts of issue #3489 – resolves artifacts names and how they are downloaded to fix the rule GH104 Use unique names for upload-artifact. They are now all downloaded in one folder for the benchmarks and the wheel builder workflows.

Type of change

Please add a line in the relevant section of CHANGELOG.md to document the change (include PR #) - note reverse order of PR #s. If necessary, also add to the list of breaking changes.

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Key checklist:

• No style issues: $ pre-commit run (or $ nox -s pre-commit) (see CONTRIBUTING.md for how to set this up to run automatically when committing locally, in just two lines of code)
• All tests pass: $ python run-tests.py --all (or $ nox -s tests)
• The documentation builds: $ python run-tests.py --doctest (or $ nox -s doctests)

You can run integration tests, unit tests, and doctests together at once, using $ python run-tests.py --quick (or $ nox -s quick).

[agriyakhetarpal]

Triggered a workflow run on my fork to ensure everything works: https://github.com/agriyakhetarpal/PyBaMM/actions/runs/8715941402 (edit: nevermind, the PyPI publishing job won't run on forks). I think it should be safe to merge, though. The Windows failures from Chocolatey are unrelated.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.58%. Comparing base (cf09d5e) to head (d2d3bae).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #4015   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    99.58%   99.58%           
========================================
  Files          257      257           
  Lines        21249    21249           
========================================
  Hits         21161    21161           
  Misses          88       88           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Saransh-cpp]

Thanks, @agriyakhetarpal! Looks good to me!