-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Coadd1d bad spec1d #1646
Merged
Merged
Coadd1d bad spec1d #1646
Changes from 24 commits
Commits
Show all changes
28 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
648bbcc
added for multislit
debora-pe 5e650ee
Merge branch 'sensfunc_blaze_jwst_lists' into coadd1d_badspec1d
debora-pe c8a27cb
Merge branch 'sensfunc_blaze_jwst_lists' into coadd1d_badspec1d
debora-pe 79da2ee
rejection added
debora-pe 480a075
Merge branch 'sensfunc_blaze_jwst_lists' into coadd1d_badspec1d
debora-pe 7122f14
small fix
debora-pe b6529f7
fix docstring
debora-pe 0d7519d
small change
debora-pe 23da51c
Merge branch 'develop' into coadd1d_badspec1d
debora-pe 3fb2fa2
joe's comments
debora-pe 96c21e6
Merge branch 'develop' into coadd1d_badspec1d
debora-pe 5e4b6f4
change verbose
debora-pe ef469a1
one fix
debora-pe 71ca995
some coadd2d fixes
debora-pe f96bc6b
fix history
debora-pe fb0d77a
small fix
debora-pe 9fdc6f9
small fix
debora-pe 1ab4836
typo
debora-pe 9f445b4
fix unit test
debora-pe 13e756d
Merge branch 'develop' into coadd1d_badspec1d
debora-pe 00495cc
some more coadd2d fixes
debora-pe 8a7ae8d
Merge branch 'develop' into coadd1d_badspec1d
debora-pe 4a03e43
Merge branch 'develop' into coadd1d_badspec1d
debora-pe 5351e1e
joes comments
debora-pe 1aec242
last comment
debora-pe 6b55d6d
Merge branch 'develop' into coadd1d_badspec1d
debora-pe d0a7e90
last comment
debora-pe 6687db3
Merge branch 'develop' into coadd1d_badspec1d
debora-pe File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This masking based on a statistical analysis of the rms_sn needs to NOT be the default behavior. My suggestion is that you set sigrej_exp to default to None. And that you only carry out the code below if sigrej_exp is not None.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Masking is not done if
sigrej_exp=None
. You can see below:There is still some stats on the S/N, which is printed in the terminal, when
sigrej_exp=None
. I think it's useful to have that information, but the masking is not applied.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay I agree printing the information is useful. I would some text to the warning if sigrej_exp is not None that indicates the exposure is being masked. Right now the user won't know it is masked from watching the terminal outputs.