Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

draft post about record-known-result #61

Open
wants to merge 15 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

cfbolz
Copy link
Member

@cfbolz cfbolz commented May 22, 2022

not ready yet, trying to get a preview

@cfbolz cfbolz force-pushed the record-known-result branch from f27ca79 to c799a13 Compare May 22, 2022 13:52
Comment on lines +78 to +79
This is all very useful! But it's still only a limited amount of things that
the interpreter author can express to the JIT with this one function decorator.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we have a list of hints we could link to?

Suggested change
This is all very useful! But it's still only a limited amount of things that
the interpreter author can express to the JIT with this one function decorator.
This is all very useful! There are additional hints
the interpreter author can express to the JIT.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was trying to look in our docs, but seems the answer unfortunately is "no, not at all" :-(
(and in general the docs are quite bad around the jit)

Copy link
Member

@mattip mattip left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. A few more for you to consider.

@@ -0,0 +1,523 @@
.. title: A Hint for Language-Specific Runtime Function Optimization in RPython's Meta-JIT
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shorter, and with a nod to the discussion of various JIT strategies

Suggested change
.. title: A Hint for Language-Specific Runtime Function Optimization in RPython's Meta-JIT
.. title: Optimizing across RPython functions in RPython's Meta-JIT

posts/2022/06/record-known-result.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
posts/2022/06/record-known-result.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
posts/2022/06/record-known-result.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
posts/2022/06/record-known-result.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
posts/2022/06/record-known-result.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
posts/2022/06/record-known-result.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants