Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use pidfd to implement trio.Process.wait, when available (2nd try) #1482

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 29, 2020

Conversation

njsmith
Copy link
Member

@njsmith njsmith commented Apr 29, 2020

This is identical to #1296, but for some reason that PR has gotten
into a glitchy state where GH won't let it be merged. So I'm opening a
second PR in hopes that GH will somehow un-wedge themselves.

Fixes #1241

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 29, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1482 into master will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1482   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.70%   99.70%           
=======================================
  Files         106      106           
  Lines       13292    13326   +34     
  Branches     1004     1009    +5     
=======================================
+ Hits        13253    13287   +34     
  Misses         24       24           
  Partials       15       15           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
trio/_subprocess.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

@njsmith
Copy link
Member Author

njsmith commented Apr 29, 2020

Failure was: #200 (comment)

I hit re-run jobs.

@njsmith
Copy link
Member Author

njsmith commented Apr 29, 2020

Huh, now this is glitched out too. Maybe the problem is hitting re-run jobs?

@njsmith
Copy link
Member Author

njsmith commented Apr 29, 2020

Yeah, that seems to have cleared it... weird. Well, I am ready for this to be done :-) @pquentin approved it already in #1296 so I'll just self-merge.

@njsmith njsmith merged commit ee4038e into python-trio:master Apr 29, 2020
@njsmith njsmith deleted the pidfd-2 branch April 29, 2020 23:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

use pidfd on Linux when available
1 participant