Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GH-109190: Copyedit 3.12 What's New: PEP 684 #109657

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 22, 2023

Conversation

AA-Turner
Copy link
Member

@AA-Turner AA-Turner commented Sep 21, 2023

  • Add an introduction to the section
  • Add a bridging note about the expected Python API and the C-API

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://cpython-previews--109657.org.readthedocs.build/en/109657/whatsnew/3.12.html#pep-684-a-per-interpreter-gil

@ambv ambv merged commit e94a223 into python:main Sep 22, 2023
23 checks passed
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @AA-Turner for the PR, and @ambv for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.12.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2023
@bedevere-app
Copy link

bedevere-app bot commented Sep 22, 2023

GH-109729 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.12 branch.

@bedevere-app bedevere-app bot removed the needs backport to 3.12 bug and security fixes label Sep 22, 2023
Yhg1s pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2023
)

GH-109190: Copyedit 3.12 What's New: PEP 684 (GH-109657)
(cherry picked from commit e94a223)

Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <[email protected]>
csm10495 pushed a commit to csm10495/cpython that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2023
@AA-Turner AA-Turner deleted the docs/whatsnew/pep-684 branch September 29, 2023 08:17
Glyphack pushed a commit to Glyphack/cpython that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants