Fix trailing spaces

docs/spec/annotations.rst

@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ have a return annotation; the default behavior is thus the same as for
 other methods.)
 
 A type checker is expected to check the body of a checked function for
-consistency with the given annotations.  The annotations may also be 
+consistency with the given annotations.  The annotations may also be
 used to check correctness of calls appearing in other checked functions.
 
 Type checkers are expected to attempt to infer as much information as

docs/spec/callables.rst

@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ compatible::
 
     class Animal(TypedDict):
         name: str
-    
+
     class Dog(Animal):
         breed: str
 
@@ -181,10 +181,10 @@ function arguments. Again, the rest of the parameters have to be compatible.
 Continuing the previous example::
 
     class Example(TypedDict):
-        animal: Animal 
+        animal: Animal
         string: str
         number: NotRequired[int]
-    
+
     def src(**kwargs: Unpack[Example]): ...
     def dest(*, animal: Dog, string: str, number: int = ...): ...
 
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ type ``T``::
 
     class Vehicle:
         ...
-    
+
     class Car(Vehicle):
         ...
 
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ type ``T``::
     class Vehicles(TypedDict):
         car: Car
         moto: Motorcycle
-    
+
     def dest(**kwargs: Unpack[Vehicles]): ...
     def src(**kwargs: Vehicle): ...
 
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ consider the following example::
 
     class Animal(TypedDict):
         name: str
-    
+
     class Dog(Animal):
         breed: str
 
@@ -290,21 +290,21 @@ consider the following example::
 
     def foo(**kwargs: Unpack[Animal]):
         print(kwargs["name"].capitalize())
-    
+
     def bar(**kwargs: Unpack[Animal]):
         takes_name(**kwargs)
-    
+
     def baz(animal: Animal):
         takes_name(**animal)
-    
+
     def spam(**kwargs: Unpack[Animal]):
         baz(kwargs)
-    
+
     foo(**animal)   # OK! foo only expects and uses keywords of 'Animal'.
 
     bar(**animal)   # WRONG! This will fail at runtime because 'breed' keyword
                     # will be passed to 'takes_name' as well.
-    
+
     spam(**animal)  # WRONG! Again, 'breed' keyword will be eventually passed
                     # to 'takes_name'.
 

docs/spec/generics.rst

@@ -1050,7 +1050,7 @@ Or when using the built-in syntax for generics in Python 3.12 and higher::
 
     class Array[*Ts]:
       ...
-    
+
     def foo[*Ts](*args: *Ts):
       ...
 
@@ -1685,7 +1685,7 @@ to the ``TypeVarTuple``:
 
     Ptang[str, bool, float]       # T1=str, T3=float, T2=bool,  Ts=tuple[()]
     Ptang[str, bool, float, int]  # T1=str, T3=int,   T2=float, Ts=tuple[bool]
-       
+
 Note that the minimum number of type arguments in such cases is set by
 the number of ``TypeVar``\s:
 
@@ -2406,7 +2406,7 @@ Here is an example.
     class ClassA[T1, T2, T3](list[T1]):
         def method1(self, a: T2) -> None:
             ...
-        
+
         def method2(self) -> T3:
             ...
 

docs/spec/historical.rst

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ complex cases, a comment of the following format may be used::
   x = [1, 2]            # type: list[int]
 
 Type comments should be put on the last line of the statement that
-contains the variable definition. 
+contains the variable definition.
 
 These should be treated as equivalent to annotating the variables
 using :pep:`526` variable annotations::

docs/spec/literal.rst

@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ allowing them in the future.
 -  Floats: e.g. ``Literal[3.14]``. Representing Literals of infinity or NaN
    in a clean way is tricky; real-world APIs are unlikely to vary their
    behavior based on a float parameter.
-  
+
 -  Any: e.g. ``Literal[Any]``. ``Any`` is a type, and ``Literal[...]`` is
    meant to contain values only. It is also unclear what ``Literal[Any]``
    would actually semantically mean.
@@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ involving Literal bools. For example, we can combine ``Literal[True]``,
        scalar += 3      # Type checks: type of 'scalar' is narrowed to 'int'
    else:
        scalar += "foo"  # Type checks: type of 'scalar' is narrowed to 'str'
-    
+
 Interactions with Final
 """""""""""""""""""""""
 

docs/spec/narrowing.rst

@@ -74,9 +74,9 @@ allows for cases like the example above where ``list[str]`` is not assignable
 to ``list[object]``.
 
 When a conditional statement includes a call to a user-defined type guard
-function, and that function returns true, the expression passed as the first 
-positional argument to the type guard function should be assumed by a static 
-type checker to take on the type specified in the TypeGuard return type, 
+function, and that function returns true, the expression passed as the first
+positional argument to the type guard function should be assumed by a static
+type checker to take on the type specified in the TypeGuard return type,
 unless and until it is further narrowed within the conditional code block.
 
 Some built-in type guards provide narrowing for both positive and negative
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ is not narrowed in the negative case.
         else:
             reveal_type(val)   # OneOrTwoStrs
             ...
-        
+
         if not is_two_element_tuple(val):
             reveal_type(val)   # OneOrTwoStrs
             ...