Updated conformance test results to reflect recent change to the rule… #1575
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…s about `NoReturn`. The previous version of the spec indicates that type checkers should reject the use of `NoReturn` outside of a return type annotation.
hauntsaninja
approved these changes
Jan 12, 2024
|
Linking python/typing-council#5 |
hauntsaninja
pushed a commit
to hauntsaninja/typing
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2024
Updated conformance test results to reflect recent change to the rules about `NoReturn`. The previous version of the spec indicates that type checkers should reject the use of `NoReturn` outside of a return type annotation.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
…s about
NoReturn. The previous version of the spec indicates that type checkers should reject the use ofNoReturnoutside of a return type annotation.