Literal unary annotation #1580
Merged
Literal unary annotation #1580
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… summary without re-running the tests.
…the use of a unary `+` within a `Literal` type annotation.
hauntsaninja
pushed a commit
to hauntsaninja/typing
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 16, 2024
* Added command-line option "--report-only" that regenerates the report summary without re-running the tests. * Updated conformance suite to reflect recent change to spec regarding the use of a unary `+` within a `Literal` type annotation.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updated conformance suite to reflect recent change to spec regarding the use of a unary
+within aLiteraltype annotation.