Skip to content

optimize sequence of acquisition functions #2931

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bletham
Copy link
Contributor

@bletham bletham commented Jul 18, 2025

Summary: Enables sequential q-batch optimization using a sequence of acquisition functions rather than the same acquisition function for each point in the batch. Right now just for when using optimize_acqf, thus focused on continuous search spaces.

Differential Revision: D78560867

sdaulton added 3 commits July 17, 2025 10:59
Summary:
This adds implements an abstract MultiOutputAcquisitionFunction in botorch, as well as two subclasses:
- A MultiOutputPosteriorMean
- A wrapper around multiple single-output AFs.

Differential Revision: D77666057
Summary: see title

Differential Revision: D77696625
Summary:
Updates:
- Use HV-maximizing greedy subset selection
- Pass MultiOutputAcquisitionFunction instead of Model as an argument
- Add support for fixed features

Differential Revision: D77696697
@meta-cla meta-cla bot added the CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. label Jul 18, 2025
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D78560867

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 18, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 15.90909% with 111 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 99.44%. Comparing base (07ce376) to head (683716d).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
botorch/utils/multi_objective/optimize.py 0.00% 61 Missing ⚠️
botorch/acquisition/multi_acquisition.py 0.00% 30 Missing ⚠️
botorch/utils/multi_objective/hypervolume.py 9.09% 20 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##              main    #2931      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   100.00%   99.44%   -0.56%     
===========================================
  Files          212      214       +2     
  Lines        19827    19907      +80     
===========================================
- Hits         19827    19796      -31     
- Misses           0      111     +111     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@bletham bletham force-pushed the export-D78560867 branch from 50e8d10 to 87113ea Compare July 21, 2025 15:12
bletham added a commit to bletham/botorch that referenced this pull request Jul 21, 2025
Summary:

Enables sequential q-batch optimization using a sequence of acquisition functions rather than the same acquisition function for each point in the batch. Right now just for when using optimize_acqf, thus focused on continuous search spaces.

Differential Revision: D78560867
Summary:
Pull Request resolved: pytorch#2931

Enables sequential q-batch optimization using a sequence of acquisition functions rather than the same acquisition function for each point in the batch. Right now just for when using optimize_acqf, thus focused on continuous search spaces.

Differential Revision: D78560867
@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request was exported from Phabricator. Differential Revision: D78560867

@bletham bletham force-pushed the export-D78560867 branch from 87113ea to 683716d Compare July 21, 2025 15:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CLA Signed Do not delete this pull request or issue due to inactivity. fb-exported
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants