Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BugFix] Fix Ray collector example error #1908

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 15, 2024
Merged

Conversation

albertbou92
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR fixes one of the issues pointed out in #1862, caused by a change of the signature of the ray.wait() method in recent ray versions.

Motivation and Context

Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here.
You can use the syntax close #15213 if this solves the issue #15213

  • I have raised an issue to propose this change (required for new features and bug fixes)

Types of changes

What types of changes does your code introduce? Remove all that do not apply:

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds core functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation (update in the documentation)
  • Example (update in the folder of examples)

Checklist

Go over all the following points, and put an x in all the boxes that apply.
If you are unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask. We are here to help!

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTION guide (required)
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the tests accordingly (required for a bug fix or a new feature).
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Feb 15, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/rl/1908

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ You can merge normally! (6 Unrelated Failures)

As of commit 711d741 with merge base 4d52d5f (image):

FLAKY - The following jobs failed but were likely due to flakiness present on trunk:

BROKEN TRUNK - The following job failed but were present on the merge base:

👉 Rebase onto the `viable/strict` branch to avoid these failures

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot facebook-github-bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Feb 15, 2024
@albertbou92 albertbou92 changed the title [Fix] Fix Ray collector example error [WIP, Fix] Fix Ray collector example error Feb 15, 2024
@albertbou92 albertbou92 changed the title [WIP, Fix] Fix Ray collector example error [Fix] Fix Ray collector example error Feb 15, 2024
@vmoens vmoens changed the title [Fix] Fix Ray collector example error [BugFix] Fix Ray collector example error Feb 15, 2024
@vmoens vmoens added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@vmoens vmoens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@vmoens vmoens merged commit 6c407bd into pytorch:main Feb 15, 2024
62 of 68 checks passed
@vmoens vmoens added the Suitable for minor Suitable to be integrated in minor release (no new feature) label Feb 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. Suitable for minor Suitable to be integrated in minor release (no new feature)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants