Example fuzzer for RT-N12 B1 httpd

[libumem]

Checklist

Which kind of PR do you create?

• This PR only contains minor fixes.
• This PR contains major feature update.
• This PR introduces a new function/api for Qiling Framework.

Coding convention?

• The new code conforms to Qiling Framework naming convention.
• The imports are arranged properly.
• Essential comments are added.
• The reference of the new code is pointed out.

Extra tests?

• No extra tests are needed for this PR.
• I have added enough tests for this PR.
• Tests will be added after some discussion and review.

Changelog?

• This PR doesn't need to update Changelog.
• Changelog will be updated after some proper review.
• Changelog has been updated in my PR.

Target branch?

• The target branch is dev branch.

One last thing

• I have read the contribution guide

---

[elicn]

Hi there and thanks for the contribution; more examples help people to moderate their learning curve.
For that very reason it is imperative that the examples will be as clean as possible and at the same time heavily commented. What are you doing and why you are doing things they way you do is key for other people to learn from the example. If too many things remain mysterious or unclear people will not learn too much, or worse, it even might confuse them.

Will appreciate you taking the time to go over the requested changes and make the necessary adjustments. Also here are a few general comments:

1. Try to adhere to PEP8 conventions, it really helps to keep the code clean and tidy
2. Use proper annotations also for return values, not only for arguments
3. Add more comments explaining what you are doing; things that are obvious to you might not be for others
4. I am not sure we are allowed to attach the firmware files here. If you have a direct like to the firmware on the vendor's website, that would be great

Cheers!

[libumem]

Try to adhere to PEP8 conventions, it really helps to keep the code clean and tidy

I've since run a linter to address this.

Use proper annotations also for return values, not only for arguments

Should be fixed now.

Add more comments explaining what you are doing; things that are obvious to you might not be for others

Added multiple comment sections to aid understanding.

I am not sure we are allowed to attach the firmware files here. If you have a direct like to the firmware on the vendor's website, that would be great

Removed firmware file (which was the wrong one anyway) and added a link to the manufacturer's page.

[elicn]

Great, thanks for making the changes.
Please see the two remaining comments.

(Make sure to tag me, so I will get notified)

[libumem]

@elicn Addressed the feedback you gave. Much appreciated.

[libumem]

Will someone else please approve this?