show warning instead of assert

[qododavid]

User description

certain test frameworks will cache the test coverage report, which hits this assert

---

PR Type

Bug fix, Tests

---

Description

• Replaced an assertion with a warning in verify_report_update.

• Updated logging behavior in CustomLogger.

• Added a test to validate warning logging in verify_report_update.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Bug fix	CoverageProcessor.py Replace assertion with warning in `verify_report_update`  cover_agent/CoverageProcessor.py Replaced an assertion with a warning in verify_report_update. Ensures the logger warns instead of halting execution. +3/-3
Enhancement	CustomLogger.py Modify logger propagation behavior                                              cover_agent/CustomLogger.py Commented out the logger.propagate line. Adjusted logger behavior for potential propagation. +1/-1
Tests	test_CoverageProcessor.py Add test for logging in `verify_report_update`                      tests/test_CoverageProcessor.py Added a test to validate warning logging in verify_report_update. Used caplog to capture and assert warning messages. +8/-5

---

Need help?

Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about Qodo Merge usage.

Check out the documentation for more information.

[qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪

🧪 PR contains tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Logger Configuration Commenting out logger.propagate=False may cause duplicate log messages if parent loggers exist. Consider documenting the reason for this change or validating the logging behavior. # logger.propagate = False Error Handling The warning message for outdated coverage report could include guidance on how to resolve the issue, since this was previously treated as a fatal error. if not file_mod_time_ms > time_of_test_command: self.logger.warning(f"The coverage report file was not updated after the test command. file_mod_time_ms: {file_mod_time_ms}, time_of_test_command: {time_of_test_command}. {file_mod_time_ms > time_of_test_command}")

[qodo-merge-pro-for-open-source]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Impact
Possible issue	✅ Fix potential duplicate logging issue Suggestion Impact: The commit implemented the suggestion by uncommenting logger.propagate=False to prevent duplicate logging in parent loggers code diff: - # logger.propagate = False + logger.propagate = False Commenting out the logger propagation control could lead to duplicate log messages in parent loggers. Either remove the comment or document why propagation is now needed. cover_agent/CustomLogger.py [60-61] # Prevent log messages from being propagated to the root logger -# logger.propagate = False +logger.propagate = False # Disabled to prevent duplicate logging in parent loggers [Suggestion has been applied] Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 __ Why: Commenting out logger.propagate=False could cause duplicate log messages to appear in parent loggers, which would degrade log readability and potentially impact debugging. The fix prevents this issue.	Medium
General	Add actionable warning message content The warning message should include guidance on potential causes and remediation steps for when the coverage report is not updated. cover_agent/CoverageProcessor.py [76-77] if not file_mod_time_ms > time_of_test_command: - self.logger.warning(f"The coverage report file was not updated after the test command. file_mod_time_ms: {file_mod_time_ms}, time_of_test_command: {time_of_test_command}. {file_mod_time_ms > time_of_test_command}") + self.logger.warning(f"The coverage report file was not updated after the test command. This may indicate test execution failure or coverage tool misconfiguration. Please verify test execution and coverage settings. file_mod_time_ms: {file_mod_time_ms}, time_of_test_command: {time_of_test_command}") Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 __ Why: The improved warning message provides helpful context and troubleshooting guidance, making it more actionable for users when coverage report issues occur.	Low
Learned best practice	Add validation for timestamp values before comparison to handle potential edge cases with invalid or negative timestamps When comparing timestamps, validate that both values are valid positive numbers before comparison to avoid potential edge cases. Add validation for the input timestamp and file modification time. cover_agent/CoverageProcessor.py [76-77] -if not file_mod_time_ms > time_of_test_command: - self.logger.warning(f"The coverage report file was not updated after the test command. file_mod_time_ms: {file_mod_time_ms}, time_of_test_command: {time_of_test_command}. {file_mod_time_ms > time_of_test_command}") +if file_mod_time_ms <= 0 or time_of_test_command <= 0: + self.logger.error(f"Invalid timestamp values: file_mod_time_ms={file_mod_time_ms}, time_of_test_command={time_of_test_command}") +elif not file_mod_time_ms > time_of_test_command: + self.logger.warning(f"The coverage report file was not updated after the test command. file_mod_time_ms: {file_mod_time_ms}, time_of_test_command: {time_of_test_command}") Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6	Low
Update