Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attempt to make CI run Pinecone tests more reliably #94

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2023

Conversation

jmartisk
Copy link
Collaborator

@jmartisk jmartisk commented Dec 5, 2023

  • split the workflow for pull_request/push to two workflows, where the one for 'push' (to main) doesn't include Pinecone tests
  • introduce a new nightly workflow that runs Pinecone tests
  • add a few more logging statements to make the Pinecone test troubleshooting easier in case all else fails

@jmartisk jmartisk requested a review from geoand December 5, 2023 12:24
@jmartisk jmartisk requested a review from a team as a code owner December 5, 2023 12:24
Copy link
Collaborator

@geoand geoand left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@geoand geoand merged commit d1b1fc0 into quarkiverse:main Dec 5, 2023
1 of 2 checks passed
@jmartisk jmartisk deleted the pinecone-ci branch December 5, 2023 14:22
@geoand
Copy link
Collaborator

geoand commented Jan 3, 2024

@jmartisk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jmartisk commented Jan 3, 2024

I found this in the log

{"code":13,"message":"We were unable to process your request. If the problem persists, please contact us at https://support.pinecone.io/","details":[]}

Seems like there was a transient issue on Pinecone side

@geoand
Copy link
Collaborator

geoand commented Jan 3, 2024

🤞

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants