Skip to content

Explicit guidelines on LLM/Agent usage #48577

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2025
Merged

Explicit guidelines on LLM/Agent usage #48577

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 25, 2025

Conversation

maxandersen
Copy link
Member

Here is a proposal on contribution guidelines for how/when to use LLM's/agents in quarkus project.

Covers both code and general communication.

Copy link

quarkus-bot bot commented Jun 24, 2025

Thanks for your pull request!

Your pull request does not follow our editorial rules. Could you have a look?

  • title should preferably start with an uppercase character (if it makes sense!)
  • title should not start with chore/docs/feat/fix/refactor but be a proper sentence

This message is automatically generated by a bot.

@maxandersen maxandersen changed the title docs: explicit guidelines on LLM/Agent usage Explicit guidelines on LLM/Agent usage Jun 24, 2025
Copy link
Member

@gsmet gsmet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but let's make sure @cescoffier has a look too.

Maybe we should start working on a code of conduct? Even if I was not excited about it at first, it looks like it's the sort of content we would like there?

@geoand geoand merged commit fd280f0 into main Jun 25, 2025
4 checks passed
@quarkus-bot quarkus-bot bot added this to the 3.25 - main milestone Jun 25, 2025
@geoand geoand deleted the llmpolicy branch June 25, 2025 07:54
Copy link
Member

@emmanuelbernard emmanuelbernard left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@emmanuelbernard
Copy link
Member

LGTM but let's make sure @cescoffier has a look too.

Maybe we should start working on a code of conduct? Even if I was not excited about it at first, it looks like it's the sort of content we would like there?

I'd recommend to decorrelate the two subjects because a code of conduct is something that takes weeks of not more of energy and heated conversations. This proposal is focused and to the point.
When we work on a code of conduct, we can refactor.

@maxandersen
Copy link
Member Author

agreed and thanks for the +1s

about code of conduct thats, commonhaus foundation has https://www.commonhaus.org/policies/code-of-conduct/ which i.e. Hibernate adopted. but yes separate pr.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants