Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend the support to Tuple in time_evolution #248

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 2, 2024

Conversation

albertomercurio
Copy link
Member

Description

Here I added the support for Tuple types in the context of time evolution, like sesolve and similars. Also for OperatorSum and TimeDependentOperatorSum.

In this way, we could support in a type stable way also lists of quantum objects with different type.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.55%. Comparing base (88519ac) to head (980af89).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #248      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.43%   93.55%   -0.88%     
==========================================
  Files          31       31              
  Lines        2266     2267       +1     
==========================================
- Hits         2140     2121      -19     
- Misses        126      146      +20     
Flag Coverage Δ
?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@ytdHuang ytdHuang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@albertomercurio albertomercurio merged commit d21041f into qutip:main Oct 2, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants