Skip to content

adjoining-classes is a nōnsensical rule, and here even required #60

adjoining-classes is a nōnsensical rule, and here even required

adjoining-classes is a nōnsensical rule, and here even required #60

Workflow file for this run

{
"jobs": {
"codacy-security-scan": {
"permissions": {
"actions": "read",
"contents": "read",
"security-events": "write"
},
"runs-on": "ubuntu-latest",
"steps": [
{
"uses": "actions/[email protected]"
},
{
"uses": "codacy/[email protected]",
"with": {
"format": "sarif",
"gh-code-scanning-compat": true,
"max-allowed-issues": 2147483647,
"output": "results.sarif",
"project-token": "${{ secrets.CODACY_PROJECT_TOKEN }}",
"verbose": true
}
},
{
"run": "jq -c '.runs |= unique_by({tool, invocations, results})' <results.sarif >editedresults.sarif\nrm results.sarif\nmkdir results.sarif\njq -c '.runs |= .[0:15]' <editedresults.sarif >results.sarif/1.sarif\njq -c '.runs |= .[15:]' <editedresults.sarif >results.sarif/2.sarif\n"
},
{
"uses": "github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v3",
"with": {
"sarif_file": "results.sarif"
}
}
]
}
},
"name": "Codacy Security Scan",
"on": {
"push": {
"branches": [
"master"
]
},
"workflow_dispatch": null
},
"permissions": {
"contents": "read"
}
}