Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create Conda CI test env in one step #4935

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: branch-25.04
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

KyleFromNVIDIA
Copy link
Contributor

@KyleFromNVIDIA KyleFromNVIDIA requested review from a team as code owners February 12, 2025 21:52
@github-actions github-actions bot added the ci label Feb 12, 2025
@KyleFromNVIDIA KyleFromNVIDIA added improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Feb 12, 2025
Copy link
Member

@jameslamb jameslamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs some changes.

Also, build failures like this:

  /pyenv/versions/3.12.9/lib/python3.12/site-packages/libraft/include/raft/spectral/detail/partition.hpp(107): error: no suitable user-defined conversion from "raft::spectral::matrix::detail::laplacian_matrix_t<int32_t, float, uint64_t>" to "const raft::spectral::matrix::detail::sparse_matrix_t<int32_t, float, int32_t>" exists
            detected during:
              instantiation of "std::tuple<vertex_t, weight_t, vertex_t> raft::spectral::detail::partition(const raft::resources &, const raft::spectral::matrix::detail::sparse_matrix_t<vertex_t, weight_t, nnz_t> &, const EigenSolver &, const ClusterSolver &, vertex_t *, weight_t *, weight_t *) [with vertex_t=int32_t, weight_t=float, nnz_t=uint64_t, EigenSolver=raft::spectral::lanczos_solver_t<int32_t, float, int32_t>, ClusterSolver=raft::spectral::kmeans_solver_t<int32_t, float, int32_t>]"
  /pyenv/versions/3.12.9/lib/python3.12/site-packages/libraft/include/raft/spectral/partition.cuh(63): here

(build link)

Should be fixed by #4934

ci/test_cpp.sh Show resolved Hide resolved
@jameslamb jameslamb removed the request for review from raydouglass February 13, 2025 16:40
Copy link
Member

@jameslamb jameslamb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

build_docs.sh needs some changes. It also looks like CI is still blocked here, waiting on #4934

ci/build_docs.sh Show resolved Hide resolved
ci/test_notebooks.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ci/build_docs.sh Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants