-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Subscript Operator #92
Conversation
Conflict between SubscriptOp and ArrayAccess. Merge both into SubscriptOp and do more work in SemanticAnalysis. |
Scopes should have some method of finding operator overloads/definitions, so that SubscriptOp can resolve the operation during SemanticAnalaysis |
With the refactor to make Scope a virtual abstract class, now we must do namespace resolution when we reference an identifier under a namespace. |
Initialise this FunDef with an implementation.c-bootstrap/src/passes/SemanticAnalysis.cpp Lines 479 to 484 in b2d3373
This comment was generated by todo based on a
|
Incorporate return type?c-bootstrap/include/ast/FunSignature.h Lines 20 to 25 in 287dbbb
This comment was generated by todo based on a
|
Create FunSignature for SubscriptOp.c-bootstrap/src/passes/SemanticAnalysis.cpp Lines 489 to 494 in 287dbbb
This comment was generated by todo based on a
|
#83 Appears to have been resolved here. |
No description provided.