test: reproduce extension bug when nested inside a module #2723
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Pushed a fix for this but I'm not happy with the extra cc @jchavarri |
anmonteiro
force-pushed
the
anmonteiro/repro-extension-bug
branch
from
178c87c
to
bfaf6f2
Compare
anmonteiro
added a commit
to anmonteiro/opam-repository
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 25, 2024
CHANGES: - Print structure items extension nodes correctly inside modules (@anmonteiro, [reasonml/reason#2723](reasonml/reason#2723)) - Print wrapped type constraint on record patterns (@anmonteiro, [reasonml/reason#2725](reasonml/reason#2725)) - Support OCaml 5.2 (@anmonteiro, [reasonml/reason#2734](reasonml/reason#2734))
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.