refactor(web): remove unsupported plugin API and options #1187
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across various files, primarily focusing on the removal of the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
❌ Deploy Preview for reearth-web failed.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
web/src/beta/features/Visualizer/Crust/Plugins/hooks/index.ts (3)
258-258: Approve simplification of useMemo dependency array with a minor suggestion.The simplification of the
useMemodependency array improves code readability. However, for even better readability, consider breaking the long line into multiple lines, grouping related dependencies together.Here's a suggested format:
[ engineName, getViewerProperty, overrideViewerPropertyCommon, getViewport, captureScreen, getInteractionMode, getInEditor, getIsBuilt, getLocationFromScreenCoordinate, getScreenCoordinateFromPosition, getTerrainHeightAsync, getGlobeHeight, getGlobeHeightByCamera, cartographicToCartesian, cartesianToCartographic, transformByOffsetOnScreen, isPositionVisibleOnGlobe, viewerEventsOn, viewerEventsOff, // ... (group other dependencies similarly) ]This format maintains the simplification while improving readability for developers working with this code in the future.
Line range hint
1-274: Overall assessment of changes.The modifications in this file, particularly the removal of
layersInViewportand the simplification of theuseMemodependency array, appear to be part of a broader refactoring effort. These changes contribute to code simplification and potentially improved performance.However, given the scope of these changes:
- Ensure thorough testing of all features related to layer management and visibility.
- Update documentation to reflect the removal of
layersInViewport.- Communicate this change to the team to ensure everyone is aware of the new approach to handling layer visibility.
Consider creating a follow-up task to review the overall architecture of layer management in the application, ensuring that the new approach is consistently implemented and well-documented across the codebase.
Issues Found: Remaining References to
layersInViewportThe removal of
layersInViewportfrom theuseLayershook and thevalueobject has left several references in the codebase. This may lead to potential regressions or unexpected behaviors.Affected Files:
web/src/beta/features/Visualizer/Crust/index.tsxweb/src/beta/features/Visualizer/Crust/Plugins/hooks/useLayers.tsweb/src/beta/features/Editor/hooks/useLayers.tsweb/src/beta/features/Editor/hooks/index.tsweb/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/context.tsxweb/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayersPanel/LayerItem.tsxPlease address these references to ensure the removal does not introduce any issues.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-274: Verify the impact of removinglayersInViewport.The removal of
layersInViewportfrom both theuseLayershook and thevalueobject appears to be part of a larger refactoring effort. While this simplification is generally positive, it's crucial to ensure that this change doesn't negatively impact other parts of the application that may have relied on this property.To confirm that this change doesn't introduce any regressions, please run the following verification script:
This script will help identify any areas of the codebase that might need attention due to the removal of
layersInViewport. Please review the results and update any affected code as necessary.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to `layersInViewport` in the codebase echo "Searching for remaining references to 'layersInViewport'..." rg -i 'layersInViewport' --type ts --type tsx echo "Checking for any 'TODO' or 'FIXME' comments related to layer visibility..." rg -i '(TODO|FIXME).*layer.*visibility' --type ts --type tsx echo "Searching for potential places where layer visibility logic might need updating..." rg -i '(layer|layers).*visibility' --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 731
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to 'layersInViewport' in the codebase echo "Searching for remaining references to 'layersInViewport'..." rg -i 'layersInViewport' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' echo "Checking for any 'TODO' or 'FIXME' comments related to layer visibility..." rg -i '(TODO|FIXME).*layer.*visibility' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' echo "Searching for potential places where layer visibility logic might need updating..." rg -i '(layer|layers).*visibility' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx'Length of output: 3624
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/Field/TypographyInput.tsx (0 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/appearanceNodes/marker.ts (1 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/types.ts (0 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Visualizer/Crust/Plugins/hooks/index.ts (1 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Visualizer/Crust/Plugins/hooks/useLayers.ts (0 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Visualizer/Crust/Plugins/pluginAPI/commonReearth.ts (0 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Visualizer/Crust/Plugins/pluginAPI/pluginAPIv1Types.ts (0 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Visualizer/Crust/Plugins/pluginAPI/types/layers.ts (0 hunks)
- web/src/beta/features/Visualizer/Crust/Plugins/storybook.tsx (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (7)
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/StyleNode/Field/TypographyInput.tsx
- web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/types.ts
- web/src/beta/features/Visualizer/Crust/Plugins/hooks/useLayers.ts
- web/src/beta/features/Visualizer/Crust/Plugins/pluginAPI/commonReearth.ts
- web/src/beta/features/Visualizer/Crust/Plugins/pluginAPI/pluginAPIv1Types.ts
- web/src/beta/features/Visualizer/Crust/Plugins/pluginAPI/types/layers.ts
- web/src/beta/features/Visualizer/Crust/Plugins/storybook.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
web/src/beta/features/Editor/Map/LayerStylePanel/Editor/StyleInterface/appearanceNodes/marker.ts (1)
100-100: Removal of "rounded" option from imageCrop valueOptionsThe removal of the "rounded" option from
imageCropaligns with the PR objective of removing rounded elements. However, consider the following points:
- Ensure that any existing markers using the "rounded" option are handled gracefully. You may need to implement a migration strategy or fallback option.
- Update any related UI components that display these options to reflect this change.
- Verify that removing this option doesn't break any dependent code or features.
To ensure this change doesn't affect other parts of the codebase, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Removal of "rounded" option from imageCrop valueOptions Verified
No references to the removed "rounded" option were found in the codebase. The removal does not affect other parts of the project.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to the removed "rounded" option in imageCrop context rg -i 'imageCrop.*rounded' --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any references to the removed "rounded" option in imageCrop context rg -i 'imageCrop.*rounded' -g "*.ts" -g "*.tsx"Length of output: 49
airslice
changed the title
airslice
changed the title
Overview
layersInViewportroundedunderlineWhat I've done
What I haven't done
How I tested
Which point I want you to review particularly
Memo
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
underlineoption from typography settings, simplifying text styling.Bug Fixes
layersInViewportfunctionality across various components, streamlining layer management.Documentation