Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

iac-for-aws-resources poster #6

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 8, 2025
Merged

iac-for-aws-resources poster #6

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 8, 2025

Conversation

matthewcornell
Copy link
Member

I've done my best to incorporate discussion on the slack thread. I took the template as inspiration for my headings - the ones here are not perfect, and I'm open to their being changed. I just needed to get something down. There are a few TODO items. Thanks!

@matthewcornell matthewcornell requested a review from zkamvar January 7, 2025 17:21
@matthewcornell matthewcornell self-assigned this Jan 7, 2025
@matthewcornell matthewcornell changed the title draft operational-models poster iac-for-aws-resources poster Jan 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@bsweger bsweger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for putting this together! Is there anything explicitly out of scope for this project?

In addition to that question, I made a few notes about the pros/cons of possible solutions, it it sounds like completing that list might be part of the project itself? (i.e., we don't have to have it exactly right at this moment)

Copy link
Member

@zkamvar zkamvar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me. I'm not familiar with the nuances between puulmi vs using boto3, but either one is better than manual configuration, so my vote is to let this go forward. Overall, I agree with Becky's comments.

I also made a minor suggestion to change to improve the readability of the diagram, but absolutely not a requirement.

@matthewcornell
Copy link
Member Author

OK, thanks a ton for your comments! I've done my best to incorporating them, including the much more readable diagram :-) . My thinking is that the poster is good enough for us to merge and then start on items #1 and #2.

@zkamvar zkamvar self-requested a review January 8, 2025 19:12
Copy link
Contributor

@bsweger bsweger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, Matt--great to see it get to the finish line!

@matthewcornell matthewcornell merged commit 7ae0465 into main Jan 8, 2025
@matthewcornell matthewcornell deleted the operational_models branch January 8, 2025 20:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants