Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Lean: put the generated functions in a namepace #1017

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 16, 2025

Conversation

ineol
Copy link
Collaborator

@ineol ineol commented Feb 16, 2025

This partially addresses the fact that Sail has a different namespace for types and terms, and as such some models have types with the same names as terms.

@ineol ineol changed the title Lean: put the generated function in a namepace Lean: put the generated functions in a namepace Feb 16, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 16, 2025

Test Results

   13 files  ±0     27 suites  ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
  811 tests ±0    811 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
2 805 runs  ±0  2 805 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 6135af6. ± Comparison against base commit c6458c5.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@tobiasgrosser
Copy link
Collaborator

Nice. I guess this just needs an update of the formatter.

@tobiasgrosser tobiasgrosser added the Lean Issues with Sail to Lean translation label Feb 16, 2025
This partially addresses the fact that Sail has a different namespace
for types and terms, and as such some models have types with the same
names as terms.
@ineol
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ineol commented Feb 16, 2025

Nice. I guess this just needs an update of the formatter.

Actually the issue is that I have forgotten to update an expected file. I don't know why it was the check formatting test that failed...

@Alasdair Alasdair merged commit f01cd79 into rems-project:sail2 Feb 16, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Lean Issues with Sail to Lean translation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants