Skip to content

Further improve JSX preserve output #7445

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2025
Merged

Further improve JSX preserve output #7445

merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2025

Conversation

cknitt
Copy link
Member

@cknitt cknitt commented May 8, 2025

No description provided.

@cknitt cknitt requested a review from nojaf May 8, 2025 18:56
@pkg-pr-new pkg.pr.new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented May 8, 2025

Open in StackBlitz

rescript

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript-lang/rescript@7445

@rescript/darwin-x64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript-lang/rescript/@rescript/darwin-x64@7445

@rescript/linux-arm64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript-lang/rescript/@rescript/linux-arm64@7445

@rescript/linux-x64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript-lang/rescript/@rescript/linux-x64@7445

@rescript/win32-x64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript-lang/rescript/@rescript/win32-x64@7445

@rescript/darwin-arm64

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/rescript-lang/rescript/@rescript/darwin-arm64@7445

commit: a1ec4d7

nojaf
nojaf approved these changes May 8, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@nojaf nojaf left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@cknitt cknitt merged commit 8f9e0f1 into master May 8, 2025
21 checks passed
@cknitt cknitt deleted the jsx-preserve-improve branch May 9, 2025 07:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@nojaf nojaf nojaf approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@cknitt @nojaf