feat(grafana): fix api dashboards

[abcxff]

Fixes all API dashboards

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
rivetkit-serverless	Error			Nov 4, 2025 8:26pm

3 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
rivet-cloud	Ignored			Nov 4, 2025 8:26pm
rivet-inspector	Ignored	Preview		Nov 4, 2025 8:26pm
rivet-site	Ignored	Preview		Nov 4, 2025 8:26pm

[claude]

Claude encountered an error —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[abcxff]

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

• fix: use correct vbare functions for runner tunnel #3300 : 2 dependent PRs (#3301 , #3332 )
• feat(grafana): fix api dashboards #3193 👈 (View in Graphite)
• fix: docker compose build #3273
• chore: fix remaining warnings for all targets #3305
• fix(gas): fix from_workflow when creating standalone ctx from op ctx #3342
• ci: udpate ci filter to succeed if no relevant changes #3343
• main

---

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add the label merge-queue to this PR to add it to the merge queue.

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[pkg-pr-new]

More templates

• example-ai-agent
• example-background-jobs
• example-better-auth-external-db
• example-bots
• chat-room
• example-cloudflare-workers
• example-cloudflare-workers-hono
• example-counter
• example-counter-serverless
• example-crdt
• example-cursors
• example-cursors-raw-websocket
• example-database
• example-deno
• example-sqlite
• example-elysia
• example-express
• example-freestyle
• example-game
• example-hono
• example-hono-bun
• example-hono-react
• example-kitchen-sink
• example-next-js
• example-rate
• example-raw-fetch-handler
• example-raw-websocket-handler
• example-raw-websocket-handler-proxy
• example-react
• example-smoke-test
• starter
• example-stream
• example-sync
• example-tenant
• example-trpc
• example-workflows

@rivetkit/actor

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/actor@3193

@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers@3193

@rivetkit/core

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/core@3193

@rivetkit/db

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/db@3193

@rivetkit/framework-base

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/framework-base@3193

@rivetkit/next-js

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/next-js@3193

@rivetkit/react

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/react@3193

rivetkit

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/rivetkit@3193

@rivetkit/sql-loader

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/sql-loader@3193

@rivetkit/engine-runner

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/engine-runner@3193

@rivetkit/engine-runner-protocol

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/engine-runner-protocol@3193

commit: 4bd5ae5

[claude]

Claude encountered an error —— View job

---

I'll analyze this and get back to you.

[claude]

PR Review: feat(grafana): fix api dashboards

Summary

This PR adds new Grafana dashboards (api.json, cache.json, gasoline.json, traces.json) and modifies existing dashboards (guard.json, tokio.json) across multiple Docker environment configurations. The changes total ~40k lines of additions across 42 files.

---

Issues Found

🔴 Critical: Inconsistent File Distribution

The dashboards are not consistently distributed across all environment configurations:

• docker/dev/ has all 7 dashboards: api, cache, futures, gasoline, guard, tokio, traces
• docker/dev-host/, docker/dev-multinode/, docker/dev-multidc/, docker/dev-multidc-multinode/ only have 4 dashboards: api, cache, gasoline, traces

Missing files:

• futures.json is missing from dev-host, dev-multinode, dev-multidc, and dev-multidc-multinode
• guard.json and tokio.json are missing from the non-engine docker/* variants, but modifications to these files ARE included in engine/docker/* variants

Impact: This inconsistency means different development environments will have different monitoring capabilities, which could lead to confusion and debugging difficulties.

Recommendation: Ensure all dashboard files are consistently present across all environment variants, or document why certain environments should have different dashboards.

---

🟡 Warning: Configuration Management Policy Violation

According to CLAUDE.md line 173:

Do not make changes to docker/dev* configs. Instead, edit the template in docker/template/ and rerun (cd docker/template && pnpm start). This will regenerate the docker compose config for you.

However, I observe that:

1. Both template directories have the dashboards: docker/template/grafana-dashboards/ AND engine/docker/template/grafana-dashboards/
2. The generation script at engine/docker/template/src/services/core/grafana.ts:98-114 copies dashboards from the template
3. But there appear to be TWO separate template systems (one in docker/template/ and one in engine/docker/template/)

Question for reviewer: Was the proper generation script run? The presence of two template directories suggests there might be two different generation processes that need to be run.

---

Positive Observations

✅ Consistent ClickHouse Integration: All dashboards correctly use the clickhouse datasource UID, matching the configuration in the generation script

✅ Valid JSON Structure: The dashboard files appear to be properly formatted Grafana dashboard JSON

✅ Template Files Updated: The new dashboards were added to template directories, which is the correct approach

---

Recommendations

1. Verify file distribution: Ensure futures.json, guard.json, and tokio.json are either added to all environment variants or explicitly document why they should only exist in certain configs

2. Run generation scripts: If there are multiple template generation scripts, ensure ALL of them have been run to properly sync the changes:

   • Check if cd docker/template && pnpm start needs to be run
   • Check if there's a separate generation script for engine/docker

3. Document the change: Consider adding information about what was fixed in the "API dashboards" - what was broken before? This helps with future maintenance

4. Consider a test: Add a simple CI check that verifies all expected dashboard files exist in all environment variants to prevent future inconsistencies

---

Minor Notes

• The PR description "Fixes all API dashboards" is quite brief - more context about what was broken would be helpful
• File sizes are reasonable (4KB - 60KB per dashboard)
• The changes don't appear to include any sensitive credentials (datasource passwords are handled via configuration, not hardcoded)

---

Verdict

Request Changes - The inconsistent file distribution across environments needs to be addressed before merging. This could cause confusion when developers use different development configurations and wonder why their dashboards look different.

Action Items:

1. Add missing dashboard files to all environment variants
2. Verify generation scripts were run properly
3. Consider adding a brief note about what was fixed

[claude]

PR Review: feat(grafana): fix api dashboards

Summary

This PR adds and updates Grafana dashboard JSON configurations across multiple docker development environments. The changes include 40,856 additions and 90 deletions across 40 files.

Positive Aspects ✅

1. Comprehensive Coverage: The changes properly propagate dashboard updates across all docker environments (dev, dev-host, dev-multinode, dev-multidc, dev-multidc-multinode)

2. New Dashboards Added: Several new monitoring dashboards have been added:

   • API dashboard (api.json) - 1,260 lines
   • Cache dashboard (cache.json) - 1,174 lines
   • Gasoline dashboard (gasoline.json) - 2,563 lines
   • Traces dashboard (traces.json) - 969 lines
   • Futures dashboard (futures.json) - 212 lines
   • Guard dashboard (guard.json) - 1,162 lines
   • Tokio dashboard (tokio.json) - 1,021 lines

3. Template-First Approach: Changes include the docker/template/grafana-dashboards/ directory, which aligns with the repository's configuration management pattern

4. Well-Structured Dashboards: The dashboard JSON files follow Grafana's standard structure with:

   • Proper datasource configuration (ClickHouse)
   • Templating variables for filtering (cluster_id, datacenter_id, server_id)
   • Appropriate visualization types (timeseries, heatmaps)
   • Good metric naming following the rivet_* convention

Concerns and Recommendations ⚠️

1. Template Generation Process (Critical)

According to CLAUDE.md, docker configuration should follow this process:

"Do not make changes to docker/dev* configs. Instead, edit the template in docker/template/ and rerun (cd docker/template && pnpm start). This will regenerate the docker compose config for you."

Issue: While the template files were modified, there's no indication in the commit message or PR description that the regeneration script was run. The PR should clarify:

• Were these files generated from the template using the proper build process?
• Or were the dashboards manually added to all environments?

Recommendation: If the changes were made manually, the proper process should be:

1. Edit only files in docker/template/grafana-dashboards/
2. Run 'cd docker/template && pnpm start' to regenerate all environment configs
3. Commit the generated changes

2. Typo in Variable Label

In multiple dashboard files (guard.json, tokio.json), there's a typo:

• Label shows "Dataceter ID" instead of "Datacenter ID"

This appears in files like:

• docker/template/grafana-dashboards/guard.json:1112
• docker/template/grafana-dashboards/tokio.json:931

Recommendation: Fix the typo in the template and regenerate.

3. Large Binary-like JSON Files

The dashboard JSON files are effectively binary artifacts generated by Grafana. With 40K+ lines added, this significantly increases repository size.

Recommendation: Consider if this is the best approach, or if dashboards should be:

• Version controlled separately
• Generated as part of CI/CD
• Stored in a dashboards-as-code format (like Grafonnet)

However, if this is the established pattern for this repository, it's acceptable.

4. Testing and Validation

Question: Have these dashboards been tested to ensure:

• All metrics queries return data correctly?
• The ClickHouse datasource is properly configured?
• Variables (cluster_id, datacenter_id, server_id) filter correctly?
• Visualization rendering works as expected?

Recommendation: Add a comment confirming these dashboards have been validated in a development environment.

5. Documentation

The PR description is minimal: "Fixes all API dashboards"

Recommendation: Enhance the PR description to include:

• What was broken in the API dashboards?
• What specific issues were fixed?
• Were new dashboards added or existing ones updated?
• Which environments were tested?

Minor Observations

1. Consistent Dashboard IDs: The dashboards use consistent patterns for metric names, query structure, and templating, which is good for maintainability.

2. Good Query Practices: The SQL queries properly use:

   • timeInterval() for dynamic time bucketing
   • conditionalAll() for optional filtering
   • timeFilter() for time range filtering
   • Proper aggregation functions (avg, sum)

3. Performance Consideration: The 15-second interval on some heatmaps is reasonable for balancing detail and performance.

Security Assessment

✅ No security concerns identified. The JSON files contain only dashboard configuration with no credentials, secrets, or sensitive data.

Verdict

Conditional Approval - This PR improves observability significantly by adding comprehensive Grafana dashboards. However, it needs clarification on:

1. ⚠️ Whether the proper template generation process was followed per CLAUDE.md
2. 🐛 The "Dataceter" typo should be fixed
3. 📝 Enhanced documentation on what was fixed

Please address these points before merging.

---

Review generated by Claude Code

[claude]

Pull Request Review

Summary

This PR adds 7 new Grafana dashboard JSON files and modifies 2 existing ones (guard.json and tokio.json) across multiple Docker development environments.

Files Added (New Dashboards):

• api.json (1,260 lines)
• cache.json (1,174 lines)
• futures.json (212 lines)
• gasoline.json (2,563 lines)
• traces.json (969 lines)
• guard.json (added to docker/, modified in engine/docker/)
• tokio.json (added to docker/, modified in engine/docker/)

✅ Positive Findings

1. Consistent File Propagation: All dashboard files are correctly synchronized across environments:

   • docker/template/grafana-dashboards/ (source of truth)
   • docker/dev/
   • docker/dev-host/
   • docker/dev-multidc/
   • docker/dev-multidc-multinode/
   • docker/dev-multinode/
   • Verified with diff commands - files are identical across environments

2. Well-Formed JSON: All files appear to be valid Grafana dashboard JSON configurations

3. Proper Template Usage: Changes were made to the template directory (docker/template/grafana-dashboards/) and propagated to all dev environments

4. Consistent Modifications: The guard.json and tokio.json modifications in engine/docker/ are consistent across all environments

⚠️ Concerns & Questions

1. CLAUDE.md Compliance Question:

   • CLAUDE.md states: "Do not make changes to docker/dev* configs. Instead, edit the template in docker/template/ and rerun (cd docker/template && pnpm start)."
   • This PR modifies 23 files in docker/dev* directories
   • Question: Was there a generation script run to propagate these changes, or were they manually copied? I could not find a package.json or generation script in docker/template/
   • Recommendation: If these were manually synced, consider creating an automated sync script to prevent future inconsistencies

2. Large File Addition Without Context:

   • Adding ~8,400 lines of generated Grafana dashboard JSON
   • Question: What specific issues were "fixed" in these dashboards? The PR description says "Fixes all API dashboards" but doesn't specify what was broken
   • Recommendation: Consider adding a brief description of what metrics/visualizations these dashboards provide

3. No Test Coverage:

   • Grafana dashboards are configuration files, but consider:
     • Do these dashboards reference metrics/datasources that exist?
     • Are there any validation checks for dashboard JSON structure?

📋 Recommendations

1. Documentation: Consider adding a README in docker/template/grafana-dashboards/ explaining:

   • What each dashboard monitors
   • How to propagate changes from template to dev environments
   • Any validation steps before committing dashboard changes

2. Automation: Create a sync script (as mentioned in CLAUDE.md) to ensure template changes are automatically propagated to all dev environments

3. Validation: Add a CI check to verify that all dev environment dashboard files match their template counterparts

🎯 Verdict

Approval Recommendation: ✅ APPROVE with suggestions

The changes are technically correct and consistent across environments. The dashboards appear well-formed and properly synchronized. However, the manual sync process is error-prone and should be automated in a follow-up PR.

---

Review generated with attention to repository conventions and CLAUDE.md guidelines

[claude]

PR Review: feat(grafana): fix api dashboards

Summary

This PR updates Grafana dashboard JSON configuration files across multiple Docker development environments. The changes are purely formatting-related, converting inline arrays to multi-line format for better readability.

Code Quality ✅

Positive:

• The changes are consistent across all 12 files (guard.json and tokio.json in 6 different docker environments)
• The formatting improves readability by expanding compact arrays like ["lastNotNull"] into multi-line format
• All changes follow a consistent pattern, suggesting they were generated systematically

Critical Issue ⚠️

CLAUDE.md Violation:
According to the project's CLAUDE.md (line 172-173):

Do not make changes to docker/dev* configs. Instead, edit the template in docker/template/ and rerun (cd docker/template && pnpm start). This will regenerate the docker compose config for you.

The problem: This PR modifies files in:

• engine/docker/dev-host/
• engine/docker/dev-multidc-multinode/
• engine/docker/dev-multidc/
• engine/docker/dev-multinode/
• engine/docker/dev/
• engine/docker/template/ ✓ (correct location)

Recommendation: Only the template files (engine/docker/template/grafana-dashboards/*.json) should be modified directly. The other files should be regenerated by running:

cd docker/template && pnpm start

This ensures consistency and follows the project's configuration management conventions.

Additional Observations

1. No functional changes: The diff shows only JSON formatting changes - no actual configuration values are modified
2. PR title/description mismatch: The PR title says "fix api dashboards" but these appear to be formatting changes to guard and tokio dashboards, not a functional fix. Consider clarifying what specific issue this resolves.
3. No test coverage needed: These are configuration files, so no code tests are required

Recommendation

Before merging:

1. Verify that only engine/docker/template/grafana-dashboards/*.json was edited manually
2. Run cd docker/template && pnpm start to regenerate all dev environment configs
3. Update the PR description to clarify what dashboard issue this fixes (or if it's purely formatting, adjust the title accordingly)

Overall, the changes look safe from a functional standpoint, but the process should align with project conventions.

[claude]

PR Review: feat(grafana): fix api dashboards

Summary

This PR applies JSON formatting fixes to Grafana dashboard configuration files across all Docker development environments. The changes are purely cosmetic, converting compact array syntax to multi-line format.

Code Quality ✅

Positive aspects:

• The changes are consistent across all affected files
• JSON formatting is improved for readability (multi-line arrays)
• All changes are made in both the template source and generated files

Observations:
According to CLAUDE.md, changes to docker/dev* configs should be made via the template in docker/template/ and regenerated. This PR correctly updates:

1. Template source: engine/docker/template/grafana-dashboards/
2. Generated files: All docker/dev*/grafana/dashboards/ directories

This approach is correct and follows the documented pattern.

Potential Issues ⚠️

1. Manual vs Generated Files

While the PR correctly updates both template and generated files, per the CLAUDE.md guidelines:

Do not make changes to docker/dev* configs. Instead, edit the template in docker/template/ and rerun (cd docker/template && pnpm start).

Recommendation: Verify that running cd engine/docker/template && pnpm start produces exactly these changes. If not, there may be a mismatch between the template generator and the manual edits.

2. Commit Scope

The PR title uses feat(grafana) but this is actually a formatting/maintenance change. Consider using:

• chore(grafana): standardize dashboard JSON formatting or
• style(grafana): format dashboard JSON arrays

This would better align with conventional commit conventions for non-functional changes.

Performance Considerations ✅

• No performance impact - these are static JSON configuration files
• File sizes increase slightly due to multi-line formatting (270 additions vs 90 deletions)
• Negligible impact on Grafana dashboard loading

Security Concerns ✅

• No security implications
• No credentials, secrets, or sensitive data modified
• Only formatting changes to existing dashboard configurations

Test Coverage

Not applicable - these are configuration files that don't require traditional test coverage. However:

Verification checklist:

• Verify dashboards load correctly in Grafana after applying these changes
• Confirm template generation (pnpm start in engine/docker/template) produces identical output
• Test at least one environment (e.g., docker/dev) to ensure dashboards render properly

Additional Observations

Files modified:

• 2 dashboard types: guard.json and tokio.json
• 6 environments: dev, dev-host, dev-multidc, dev-multidc-multinode, dev-multinode, template

Changes pattern:
All modifications follow the same pattern:

-"calcs": ["lastNotNull"],
+"calcs": [
+    "lastNotNull"
+],

This is standard JSON formatting preference and has no functional impact.

Verdict

LGTM with minor recommendations ✅

The changes are safe and improve JSON readability. The main suggestion is to verify the commit type convention and ensure template generation is properly aligned with the manual changes.

[claude]

PR Review: Fix API Dashboards

Summary

This PR fixes Grafana dashboard JSON formatting by expanding inline array literals to multi-line format. The changes are applied consistently across all Docker development environment configurations.

Changes Overview

• Files modified: 12 Grafana dashboard JSON files (guard.json and tokio.json)
• Environments affected: dev, dev-host, dev-multinode, dev-multidc, dev-multidc-multinode, and template
• Change type: JSON formatting standardization

Review Findings

✅ Positive Aspects

1. Consistent formatting: The changes are applied uniformly across all dashboard files
2. No functional changes: The modifications are purely cosmetic - changing from inline arrays like ["lastNotNull"] to multi-line format
3. Follows template pattern: The changes are made to the template source (engine/docker/template/grafana-dashboards/) and propagated to generated configs, which is the correct approach per CLAUDE.md

⚠️ Concerns & Recommendations

1. Generated files included in PR

   • According to CLAUDE.md: "Do not make changes to docker/dev* configs. Instead, edit the template in docker/template/ and rerun (cd docker/template && pnpm start)"
   • The PR includes changes to both template files AND generated files (dev, dev-host, dev-multinode, etc.)
   • Recommendation: Verify that the generated files were produced by running the template generator, not edited manually. If they were generated correctly, this is fine.

2. Missing context in PR description

   • The description "Fixes all API dashboards" doesn't explain what was broken or why the formatting change was needed
   • Recommendation: Update the PR description to explain:
     • What issue this formatting change resolves
     • Whether this was causing parsing errors or compatibility issues
     • Why the multi-line array format is preferred

3. No test evidence

   • No indication that dashboards were tested after the changes
   • Recommendation: Verify that:
     • Grafana can successfully import these dashboard files
     • All panels render correctly
     • The dashboards function identically to before

4. Commit message

   • Current: "feat(grafana): fix api dashboards"
   • The feat prefix suggests a new feature, but this appears to be a fix
   • Recommendation: Consider using fix(grafana): or chore(grafana): instead

🔍 Code Quality

• JSON validity: The changes maintain valid JSON structure
• Consistency: All occurrences of the pattern are updated consistently
• Scope: Changes are limited to the specific formatting issue without introducing unrelated modifications

Verdict

The PR is functionally sound but would benefit from:

1. Confirmation that generated files were produced by the template generator
2. Better documentation of what issue this resolves
3. Evidence of testing in at least one environment

The changes themselves are low-risk since they're purely formatting modifications that don't alter the dashboard behavior.

---

Review generated by Claude Code

[graphite-app]

Merge activity

• Nov 4, 8:09 PM UTC: NathanFlurry added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
• Nov 4, 8:10 PM UTC: CI is running for this pull request on a draft pull request (#3349) due to your merge queue CI optimization settings.
• Nov 4, 8:41 PM UTC: The Graphite merge queue removed this pull request due to removal of a downstack PR #3342.
• Nov 4, 8:47 PM UTC: NathanFlurry added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.
• Nov 4, 8:47 PM UTC: CI is running for this pull request on a draft pull request (#3351) due to your merge queue CI optimization settings.
• Nov 4, 8:49 PM UTC: Merged by the Graphite merge queue via draft PR: #3351.

[claude]

PR Review: feat(grafana): fix api dashboards

Summary

This PR reformats JSON arrays in Grafana dashboard configuration files from single-line to multi-line format. The changes affect both guard.json and tokio.json dashboards across multiple Docker development environments.

Observations

1. Potential Issue: Generated Files Modified

According to CLAUDE.md:

Do not make changes to docker/dev* configs. Instead, edit the template in docker/template/ and rerun (cd docker/template && pnpm start). This will regenerate the docker compose config for you.

Finding: This PR modifies files in multiple docker/dev* directories (dev, dev-host, dev-multidc, dev-multidc-multinode, dev-multinode), which appear to be generated from the template. While the template files (engine/docker/template/grafana-dashboards/*.json) are also updated, the workflow suggests these generated files should not be manually edited.

Recommendation: Verify that:

• Only the template files (engine/docker/template/grafana-dashboards/*.json) should be edited
• The other files should be regenerated using the template tooling
• If this pattern was followed, confirm the generation process was run correctly

2. Code Quality: JSON Formatting

The changes convert compact JSON arrays to multi-line format:

Before:

"calcs": ["lastNotNull"],

After:

"calcs": [
    "lastNotNull"
],

Assessment: This is a stylistic preference. Multi-line format can improve:

• Readability in diffs when arrays grow
• Merge conflict resolution
• Consistency with other parts of the JSON files

However, for single-element arrays, the benefit is minimal.

3. PR Title/Scope Mismatch

The PR description states "Fixes all API dashboards" but the changes are purely cosmetic JSON formatting. No functional changes to dashboard queries, visualizations, or configurations are present.

Question: What specific dashboard issues were being fixed? The changes appear to be formatting-only.

4. Consistency

✅ All instances of the pattern are consistently updated across all files
✅ The template source files are included in the changes

Security & Performance

✅ No security concerns - configuration files only
✅ No performance impact - JSON formatting does not affect runtime

Test Coverage

⚠️ No tests are applicable for Grafana dashboard JSON configuration files

Recommendations

1. Clarify the PR description - Either update it to reflect that this is a formatting change, or explain what functional issues were fixed
2. Verify the template workflow - Confirm whether the docker/dev* files should have been manually edited or regenerated from templates
3. Consider using a JSON formatter - If JSON formatting standardization is desired, consider using a tool like jq or prettier to ensure consistent formatting across all JSON files

Verdict

The changes are technically correct but may not follow the repository's documented workflow for managing generated Docker configuration files. Please clarify the intent and verify the template generation process was followed correctly.

[claude]

PR Review: Fix API Dashboards

Summary

This PR fixes Grafana dashboard JSON formatting issues across multiple Docker development environments. The changes are purely cosmetic - reformatting JSON arrays to use multi-line format instead of single-line.

Code Quality: ✅ Good

Positives:

• Consistent formatting applied across all affected files
• Changes follow standard JSON formatting conventions
• No functional changes, only formatting improvements

Observations:

• The changes convert compact JSON arrays like ["lastNotNull"] to multi-line format:

  [
    "lastNotNull"
  ]

• This improves readability and makes diffs clearer in future changes

Architectural Concerns: ⚠️ Process Issue

According to the CLAUDE.md configuration management section:

Docker Development Configuration
Do not make changes to docker/dev* configs. Instead, edit the template in docker/template/ and rerun (cd docker/template && pnpm start). This will regenerate the docker compose config for you.

Issue: This PR modifies files in multiple docker/dev* directories directly:

• engine/docker/dev-host/grafana/dashboards/
• engine/docker/dev-multidc-multinode/core/grafana/dashboards/
• engine/docker/dev-multidc/core/grafana/dashboards/
• engine/docker/dev-multinode/grafana/dashboards/
• engine/docker/dev/grafana/dashboards/

While the template files (engine/docker/template/grafana-dashboards/) were also updated, the question is whether the dev* files should have been regenerated from the template rather than manually edited.

Recommendation:

1. Verify that the template regeneration process would produce these same changes
2. Consider if future template regeneration might overwrite these manual edits
3. Document whether Grafana dashboard JSON files are an exception to the template rule

Other Observations:

No bugs detected - Changes are purely formatting
No performance impact - JSON parsing unaffected by formatting
No security concerns - No functional changes
Test coverage - N/A (configuration files only)

Verdict: ✅ Approve with caveat

The changes themselves are fine and improve JSON readability. However, please confirm that:

1. These files are meant to be edited directly (exception to CLAUDE.md guidance)
2. OR ensure the template regeneration process is run to maintain consistency

Otherwise, LGTM! 🚀