C++ version of _solve_direct in BasisInterp #171
Closed
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
After discussing with Nate Lust, on accelerating Piff, he basically came to the same conclusion as me and that accelerating
PixelGrid
+BasisInterp
meant accelerating_solve_direct
inBasisInterp
. As I am not a C++ expert I went through the path of implementing it in JAX in this #166.Nate already implemented a version in C++ and Eigen that is faster than the pure python implementation even on a single core it looks like. I'll let him push his code on that branch and I'll make the test / unit test to validate the C++ implementation and clean the
_solve_direct
in regards of the last change I push (see if JAX is still worst it compared to the C++ implementation).Just putting this as a draft PR for the moment.
Not ready for review.